From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C000FCAC5B0 for ; Sat, 27 Sep 2025 13:47:51 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:Message-ID:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date: MIME-Version:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From: Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=viO8D+Qu2R6riMUQBJZA4lci0O87eiHC/lld0s2EB4A=; b=RTdmxOOzgBARI+OCYxFhnYmV9L 9/S/LFAl5XLvqrDZtGvTmvunAWf87FjdXOBa+lioBrEbYJeUP3PE39SHddEsB/FAeTuN34mrRJtue AtNclssOjtAsUZRsahP/HdnielmtUv0cL8MwlOZpXiZWLAGqHVzY0wGKctOsm3T5k/yMUEe4l2Ndh 2AeL02GzcOU9qSeN925gDMYgNiXGY/6cZvZ9UHaj5Aopk63pAdZrPn9SR2aD31xzfVdbW7Mweb+0a ceeKdMOGMfFICaZkxahWy83AOLScymNwmAIbyMidmdCY6htldRtsBSEXP8mDmVakw7PQ7aFcZTE72 0TqW1esQ==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1v2VH5-0000000A6Pp-3kCL; Sat, 27 Sep 2025 13:47:43 +0000 Received: from mail.manjaro.org ([116.203.91.91]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1v2VH2-0000000A6MA-41Ki; Sat, 27 Sep 2025 13:47:42 +0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=manjaro.org; s=2021; t=1758980856; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=viO8D+Qu2R6riMUQBJZA4lci0O87eiHC/lld0s2EB4A=; b=k1TkaTrKrNDGCaTdjNAzJ54xvUbwa6oLdyeabtuQche1UzsO4we+X1IcKp6h0zBbBkwPKs lri59Pl1DSM0NoDtpcluC29zfICKCZ8lSyFHfOPSamPaUJuROwZ/uGt1nhG3J7J2NOe9Nb O/KIgDxmBszhbBzxLZb6JZoBLW48y1WlSML5W0dDdw/K553F4HosjgBSnujXaFdEKlx1fZ HJFlk5RI4+khI/ZU0gzIf9FbSwPulObZIkJ/MX7RHhJn3TtSOB7KTxYKH8SJ/hDqtFCi2g XriAwvbvt71g5BRuVo2C5ryf4QkHuTqP9tV+zbGNOYzYF2NvKczLJTNBblVimw== Date: Sat, 27 Sep 2025 15:47:35 +0200 From: Dragan Simic To: Diederik de Haas Cc: Tianling Shen , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , Heiko Stuebner , Jonas Karlman , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] arm64: dts: rockchip: Add devicetree for the FriendlyElec NanoPi R76S In-Reply-To: References: <20250922091509.2695565-1-cnsztl@gmail.com> <20250922091509.2695565-2-cnsztl@gmail.com> <1bb00ad6-ffe1-4783-909b-032dfb984180@gmail.com> Message-ID: X-Sender: dsimic@manjaro.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Authentication-Results: ORIGINATING; auth=pass smtp.auth=dsimic@manjaro.org smtp.mailfrom=dsimic@manjaro.org X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20250927_064741_222084_7C4AA4E3 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 13.13 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org Hello Diederik and Tianling, On 2025-09-27 09:37, Diederik de Haas wrote: > On Sat Sep 27, 2025 at 3:19 AM CEST, Tianling Shen wrote: >> On 2025/9/27 0:07, Diederik de Haas wrote: >>> It is recommended to use the labels in the schematics to define the >>> pinctl nodes (and thus their references). In quite a lot of cases >>> that's >>> indeed the case, but not for gpio-keys (USER_BUT) or these gpio-leds >>> pinctls. >> >> I cannot find any specific naming rules from the gpio-keys[1] and >> gpio-leds[2] bindings, did I miss any update? >> >> I think this naming matches the current practice at least in >> rockchip's >> dt tree. > > There is an unofficial rule/aim: > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-rockchip/5360173.ktpJ11cQ8Q@diego/ > But granted, there is 'some' inconsistency. > > And used in f.e. > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-rockchip/20250727144409.327740-4-jonas@kwiboo.se/ > > Where you can just copy the pinctrl labels from the dts[i] and paste > that in the schematic document and you're instantly at the right place. > Which is the exact purpose of that rule/aim. Is the schematic actually publicly available? I tried searching for it, but found nothing, unfortunately.