Re: [PATCH v2 2/8] dt-bindings: counter: Add new ti,am62-eqep compatible

From: Judith Mendez <jm@ti.com>
To: David Lechner <david@lechnology.com>,
	Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
	Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	William Breathitt Gray <william.gray@linaro.org>
Cc: <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	<devicetree@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-iio@vger.kernel.org>, Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>,
	Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@ti.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/8] dt-bindings: counter: Add new ti,am62-eqep compatible
Date: Fri, 24 May 2024 16:33:21 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <d0abda4f-2e8c-49ff-bdeb-63fb5e969e84@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2956d10b-d2cf-4019-adc8-d8053e435767@lechnology.com>

On 5/24/24 3:50 PM, David Lechner wrote:
> On 5/23/24 6:15 PM, Judith Mendez wrote:
>> Add new compatible ti,am62-eqep for TI K3 devices. If a device
>> uses this compatible, require power-domains property.
>>
>> Since there is only one functional and interface clock for eqep,
>> clock-names is not really required. The clock-name also changed
>> for TI K3 SoCs so make clock-names optional for the new compatible
>> since there is only one clock that is routed to the IP.
>>
>> While we are here, add an example using ti,am62-eqep compatible.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Judith Mendez <jm@ti.com>
>> ---
>> Changes since v1:
>> - Fix eqep binding for new compatible, require
>>   power-domains for new compatible
>> ---
>>   .../devicetree/bindings/counter/ti-eqep.yaml  | 53 +++++++++++++++++--
>>   1 file changed, 48 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/counter/ti-eqep.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/counter/ti-eqep.yaml
>> index 85f1ff83afe72..c4bb0231f166a 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/counter/ti-eqep.yaml
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/counter/ti-eqep.yaml
>> @@ -11,7 +11,9 @@ maintainers:
>>   
>>   properties:
>>     compatible:
>> -    const: ti,am3352-eqep
>> +    enum:
>> +      - ti,am3352-eqep
>> +      - ti,am62-eqep
>>   
>>     reg:
>>       maxItems: 1
>> @@ -21,19 +23,43 @@ properties:
>>       maxItems: 1
>>   
>>     clocks:
>> -    description: The clock that determines the SYSCLKOUT rate for the eQEP
>> -      peripheral.
>> +    description: The functional and interface clock that determines the clock
>> +      rate for the eQEP peripheral.
>>       maxItems: 1
>>   
>>     clock-names:
>> -    const: sysclkout
>> +    enum:
>> +      - sysclkout
>> +      - fck
>> +
> 
> If we are making this optional for ti,am62-eqep, why add a new name?
> 
> Also, we could change the description to say that sysclockout is not a
> great name but is required for backwards compatibility.

This is fine with me. Will update for v3.

> 
>> +  power-domains:
>> +    maxItems: 1
>> +
>> +allOf:
>> +  - if:
>> +      properties:
>> +        compatible:
>> +          contains:
>> +            enum:
>> +              - ti,am3352-eqep
>> +    then:
>> +      required:
>> +        - clock-names
> 
> What if we just add
> 
>    else:
>      clock-names: false
> 
> since there is only one clock and not worry about the name?

Yes, can do, thanks.

> 
>> +  - if:
>> +      properties:
>> +        compatible:
>> +          contains:
>> +            enum:
>> +              - ti,am62-eqep
>> +    then:
>> +      required:
>> +        - power-domains
>>   
>>   required:
>>     - compatible
>>     - reg
>>     - interrupts
>>     - clocks
>> -  - clock-names
>>   

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel