From: Stefan Wahren <stefan.wahren@i2se.com>
To: Jim Quinlan <jim2101024@gmail.com>,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenz@kernel.org>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>,
Cyril Brulebois <kibi@debian.org>,
Phil Elwell <phil@raspberrypi.com>,
bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com,
james.quinlan@broadcom.com
Cc: "Florian Fainelli" <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
"Lorenzo Pieralisi" <lpieralisi@kernel.org>,
"Krzysztof Wilczyński" <kw@linux.com>,
"Rob Herring" <robh@kernel.org>,
"Krzysztof Kozlowski" <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
"moderated list:BROADCOM BCM2711/BCM2835 ARM ARCHITECTURE"
<linux-rpi-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
"moderated list:BROADCOM BCM2711/BCM2835 ARM ARCHITECTURE"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
"open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS"
<devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
"open list" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/3] dt-bindings: PCI: brcmstb: Add two optional props
Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2023 17:39:02 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <d0bf241b-ead4-94b7-3f03-a26227f9eb58@i2se.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230406124625.41325-2-jim2101024@gmail.com>
Hi Jim,
Am 06.04.23 um 14:46 schrieb Jim Quinlan:
> Regarding "brcm,enable-l1ss":
>
> The Broadcom STB/CM PCIe HW -- which is also used by RPi SOCs -- requires
> the driver probe to configure one of three clkreq# modes:
>
> (a) clkreq# driven by the RC
> (b) clkreq# driven by the EP for ASPM L0s, L1
> (c) bidirectional clkreq#, as used for L1 Substates (L1SS).
>
> The HW can tell the difference between (a) and (b), but does not know
> when to configure (c). Further, the HW will cause a CPU abort on boot if
> guesses wrong regarding the need for (c). So we introduce the boolean
> "brcm,enable-l1ss" property to indicate that (c) is desired. This
> property is already present in the Raspian version of Linux, but the
> driver implementaion that will follow adds more details and discerns
> between (a) and (b).
>
> Regarding "brcm,completion-timeout-msecs"
>
> Our HW will cause a CPU abort if the L1SS exit time is longer than the
> completion abort timeout. We've been asked to make this configurable, so
> we are introducing "brcm,completion-abort-msecs".
>
> Signed-off-by: Jim Quinlan <jim2101024@gmail.com>
> ---
> .../devicetree/bindings/pci/brcm,stb-pcie.yaml | 12 ++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/brcm,stb-pcie.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/brcm,stb-pcie.yaml
> index 7e15aae7d69e..ef4ccc05b258 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/brcm,stb-pcie.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/brcm,stb-pcie.yaml
> @@ -64,6 +64,18 @@ properties:
>
> aspm-no-l0s: true
>
> + brcm,enable-l1ss:
> + description: Indicates that the downstream device is L1SS
> + capable and L1SS is desired, e.g. by setting
> + CONFIG_PCIEASPM_POWER_SUPERSAVE=y. Note that CLKREQ#
not sure about this, but maybe we should avoid references to Linux
kernel config parameter in a DT binding. Since the driver already gaves
warning in case the DT parameter is present, but kernel config doesn't
fit, this should be enough.
> + assertion to clock active must be within 400ns.
> + type: boolean
> +
> + brcm,completion-timeout-msecs:
> + description: Number of msecs before completion timeout
> + abort occurs.
> + $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint32
According to the driver at least 0 is not allowed, maybe we should
define minimum and maximum here and let dtbs_check take care of invalid
values?
Best regards
> +
> brcm,scb-sizes:
> description: u64 giving the 64bit PCIe memory
> viewport size of a memory controller. There may be up to
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-04-06 15:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-04-06 12:46 [PATCH v1 0/3] PCI: brcmstb: Clkreq# accomodations of downstream device Jim Quinlan
2023-04-06 12:46 ` [PATCH v1 1/3] dt-bindings: PCI: brcmstb: Add two optional props Jim Quinlan
2023-04-06 15:39 ` Stefan Wahren [this message]
2023-04-06 16:58 ` Jim Quinlan
2023-04-06 18:35 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2023-04-06 18:47 ` Florian Fainelli
2023-04-06 18:53 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2023-04-06 18:34 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2023-04-06 18:53 ` Florian Fainelli
2023-04-06 18:54 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2023-04-06 12:46 ` [PATCH v1 2/3] PCI: brcmstb: Clkreq# accomodations of downstream device Jim Quinlan
2023-04-06 19:09 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2023-04-06 20:03 ` Jim Quinlan
2023-04-06 12:46 ` [PATCH v1 3/3] PCI: brcmstb: Allow setting the completion timeout Jim Quinlan
2023-04-06 15:59 ` Stefan Wahren
2023-04-06 17:15 ` Jim Quinlan
2023-04-06 21:31 ` [PATCH v1 0/3] PCI: brcmstb: Clkreq# accomodations of downstream device Cyril Brulebois
2023-04-07 15:06 ` Hank Barta
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=d0bf241b-ead4-94b7-3f03-a26227f9eb58@i2se.com \
--to=stefan.wahren@i2se.com \
--cc=bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
--cc=james.quinlan@broadcom.com \
--cc=jim2101024@gmail.com \
--cc=kibi@debian.org \
--cc=krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org \
--cc=kw@linux.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rpi-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
--cc=lpieralisi@kernel.org \
--cc=nsaenz@kernel.org \
--cc=phil@raspberrypi.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox