From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1E578FF8873 for ; Thu, 30 Apr 2026 14:07:07 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID: Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=odfisOKLb+4yvBy7AJ37qHBwXC8cw5zHJIG7y4mEJ/0=; b=X+PSoSwVtvJQp+bjAiHGdhCrih l1mruUaL2VpRIUpaRxF4aPqclxOoTPxGtUTS8UnXT7gzEchZf6kMQ/4uuNWEf3ctESVt0mVsC3W3m heqkSm9kKD7QAq8dAZc/YFTjUtNS5nQpAXJrZ/P5/C/1S2ZQVjl7vxMC+uz/ROXDjQfQ0CW9QEBt2 wyAPnx4qKaUZObySitBUvMoyS+grIis4Sc1Ih9loXQirCtQiscAn2nDsy8ETSVW3Q4o3LbZ2BOHhM xRIYyBOQmLz5hslj5aNTF9h8IzvOYWZ5+FzbjiwaCQW8dlN1wpHVLy/Gymz4UF3uOQRjC2gURPoXN SJh53Kyw==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1wIS2c-00000005Z9e-3fuG; Thu, 30 Apr 2026 14:06:59 +0000 Received: from vps0.lunn.ch ([156.67.10.101]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1wIS2a-00000005Z95-2E1A for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Thu, 30 Apr 2026 14:06:57 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lunn.ch; s=20171124; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Disposition: Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:From: Sender:Reply-To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:To:Cc:MIME-Version:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Content-Disposition: In-Reply-To:References; bh=odfisOKLb+4yvBy7AJ37qHBwXC8cw5zHJIG7y4mEJ/0=; b=XR qQ7vFu0LANTE4mm9ix8Cgztidd9/ZquCyUK52yVFPuQkm5lA+iProb2QG98KcUuj8BRdUyali4w+T zG9zkQXaIC2wUnl+2rx33fzfb3xFiypXO6j5ybYInFDr+7zSh6p2Ise5RUbF307L3xY6+bXOi7Sma TbT+nrZPd4U9qIU=; Received: from andrew by vps0.lunn.ch with local (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1wIS2J-000gvp-5P; Thu, 30 Apr 2026 16:06:39 +0200 Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2026 16:06:39 +0200 From: Andrew Lunn To: Josua Mayer Cc: Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , Shawn Guo , Frank Li , Sascha Hauer , Pengutronix Kernel Team , Fabio Estevam , Vladimir Oltean , "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Jakub Kicinski , Paolo Abeni , Yazan Shhady , Mikhail Anikin , Alexander Dahl , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "imx@lists.linux.dev" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , Vladimir Oltean , Conor Dooley , Krzysztof Kozlowski , "netdev@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] arm64: dts: imx8dxl: Add SolidRun SoM and HummingBoard Message-ID: References: <20260409-imx8dxl-sr-som-v2-0-83ff20629ba0@solid-run.com> <20260409-imx8dxl-sr-som-v2-3-83ff20629ba0@solid-run.com> <8efbafe3-0a8a-4005-960c-e8fe62cee719@lunn.ch> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20260430_070656_571955_D5755149 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 12.38 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org > > Reviewed-by: Andrew Lunn > > > > Andrew > > Thanks! > > I don't know how to keep this partial review for v3, so I will send it without. You can add my Reviewed-by. It is on record in the archive that it only applies to a subset. And in general, nobody can know the whole kernel, all the different subsystems, and the details for all the DT bindings. So i would allow some fuzziness for Reviewed-by: for a DT patch. Interesting, an Acked-by: might actually be more appropriate. Acked-by: does not necessarily indicate acknowledgement of the entire patch. For example, if a patch affects multiple subsystems and has an Acked-by: from one subsystem maintainer then this usually indicates acknowledgement of just the part which affects that maintainer’s code. Judgement should be used here. So how about: Acked-by: Andrew Lunn and you can take your pick :-) Andrew