linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yang Shi <yang@os.amperecomputing.com>
To: Kevin Brodsky <kevin.brodsky@arm.com>, linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
	Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com>, Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>,
	Jeff Xu <jeffxu@chromium.org>, Joey Gouly <joey.gouly@arm.com>,
	Kees Cook <kees@kernel.org>,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
	Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com>,
	Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>, Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
	Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
	Maxwell Bland <mbland@motorola.com>,
	"Mike Rapoport (IBM)" <rppt@kernel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Pierre Langlois <pierre.langlois@arm.com>,
	Quentin Perret <qperret@google.com>,
	Rick Edgecombe <rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com>,
	Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	x86@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v5 00/18] pkeys-based page table hardening
Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2025 15:31:46 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <d10e3bc5-5574-4498-9849-732fb373fa83@os.amperecomputing.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b9212134-0efa-422d-8cbf-4761e39ce8d6@arm.com>



On 8/27/25 9:09 AM, Kevin Brodsky wrote:
> On 26/08/2025 21:18, Yang Shi wrote:
>>>>> from a contiguous cache of pages could help minimise the overhead, as
>>>>> proposed for x86 in [1].
>>>> I'm a little bit confused about how this can work. The contiguous
>>>> cache of pages should be some large page, for example, 2M. But the
>>>> page table pages allocated from the cache may have different
>>>> permissions if I understand correctly. The default permission is RO,
>>>> but some of them may become R/W at sometime, for example, when calling
>>>> set_pte_at(). You still need to split the linear mapping, right?
>>> When such a helper is called, *all* PTPs become writeable - there is no
>>> per-PTP permission switching.
>> OK, so all PTPs in the same contiguous cache will become writeable
>> even though the helper (i.e. set_pte_at()) is just called on one of
>> the PTPs.  But doesn't it compromise the page table hardening somehow?
>> The PTPs from the same cache may belong to different processes.
> First just a note that this is true regardless of how the PTPs are
> allocated (i.e. this is already the case in this version of the series).
>
> Either way, yes you are right, this approach does not introduce any
> isolation *between* page tables - pgtable helpers are able to write to
> all page tables. In principle it should be possible to use a different
> pkey for kernel and user page tables, but that would make the kpkeys
> level switching in helpers quite a bit more complicated. Isolating
> further is impractical as we have so few pkeys (just 8 on arm64).
>
> That said, what kpkeys really tries to protect against is the direct
> corruption of critical data by arbitrary (unprivileged) code. If the
> attacker is able to manipulate calls to set_pte() and the likes, kpkeys
> cannot provide much protection - even if we restricted the writes to a
> specific set of page tables, the attacker would still be able to insert
> a translation to any arbitrary physical page.

I see. Thanks for elaborating this.

Yang

>
> - Kevin



      reply	other threads:[~2025-08-30  1:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-08-15  8:54 [RFC PATCH v5 00/18] pkeys-based page table hardening Kevin Brodsky
2025-08-15  8:54 ` [RFC PATCH v5 01/18] mm: Introduce kpkeys Kevin Brodsky
2025-08-15  8:54 ` [RFC PATCH v5 02/18] set_memory: Introduce set_memory_pkey() stub Kevin Brodsky
2025-08-15  8:54 ` [RFC PATCH v5 03/18] arm64: mm: Enable overlays for all EL1 indirect permissions Kevin Brodsky
2025-08-15  8:54 ` [RFC PATCH v5 04/18] arm64: Introduce por_elx_set_pkey_perms() helper Kevin Brodsky
2025-08-15  8:54 ` [RFC PATCH v5 05/18] arm64: Implement asm/kpkeys.h using POE Kevin Brodsky
2025-08-15  8:55 ` [RFC PATCH v5 06/18] arm64: set_memory: Implement set_memory_pkey() Kevin Brodsky
2025-08-15  8:55 ` [RFC PATCH v5 07/18] arm64: Reset POR_EL1 on exception entry Kevin Brodsky
2025-08-15  8:55 ` [RFC PATCH v5 08/18] arm64: Context-switch POR_EL1 Kevin Brodsky
2025-08-15  8:55 ` [RFC PATCH v5 09/18] arm64: Enable kpkeys Kevin Brodsky
2025-08-15  8:55 ` [RFC PATCH v5 10/18] mm: Introduce kernel_pgtables_set_pkey() Kevin Brodsky
2025-08-15  8:55 ` [RFC PATCH v5 11/18] mm: Introduce kpkeys_hardened_pgtables Kevin Brodsky
2025-08-15  8:55 ` [RFC PATCH v5 12/18] mm: Allow __pagetable_ctor() to fail Kevin Brodsky
2025-08-15  8:55 ` [RFC PATCH v5 13/18] mm: Map page tables with privileged pkey Kevin Brodsky
2025-08-15 16:37   ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2025-08-18 16:02     ` Kevin Brodsky
2025-08-18 17:01       ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2025-08-19  9:35         ` Kevin Brodsky
2025-08-15  8:55 ` [RFC PATCH v5 14/18] arm64: kpkeys: Support KPKEYS_LVL_PGTABLES Kevin Brodsky
2025-08-15  8:55 ` [RFC PATCH v5 15/18] arm64: mm: Guard page table writes with kpkeys Kevin Brodsky
2025-08-15  8:55 ` [RFC PATCH v5 16/18] arm64: Enable kpkeys_hardened_pgtables support Kevin Brodsky
2025-08-15  8:55 ` [RFC PATCH v5 17/18] mm: Add basic tests for kpkeys_hardened_pgtables Kevin Brodsky
2025-08-15  8:55 ` [RFC PATCH v5 18/18] arm64: mm: Batch kpkeys level switches Kevin Brodsky
2025-08-20 15:53 ` [RFC PATCH v5 00/18] pkeys-based page table hardening Kevin Brodsky
2025-08-20 16:01   ` Kevin Brodsky
2025-08-20 16:18     ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2025-08-21  7:23       ` Kevin Brodsky
2025-08-21 17:29 ` Yang Shi
2025-08-25  7:31   ` Kevin Brodsky
2025-08-26 19:18     ` Yang Shi
2025-08-27 16:09       ` Kevin Brodsky
2025-08-29 22:31         ` Yang Shi [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=d10e3bc5-5574-4498-9849-732fb373fa83@os.amperecomputing.com \
    --to=yang@os.amperecomputing.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=ira.weiny@intel.com \
    --cc=jannh@google.com \
    --cc=jeffxu@chromium.org \
    --cc=joey.gouly@arm.com \
    --cc=kees@kernel.org \
    --cc=kevin.brodsky@arm.com \
    --cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=mbland@motorola.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=pierre.langlois@arm.com \
    --cc=qperret@google.com \
    --cc=rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com \
    --cc=rppt@kernel.org \
    --cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).