From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.0 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BB5AC282DA for ; Thu, 11 Apr 2019 08:51:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 20FB82184B for ; Thu, 11 Apr 2019 08:51:10 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="DZ/LlP+R" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 20FB82184B Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=huawei.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=Sender:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:From: References:To:Subject:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=hYuw3pg6HUr4NRV2TFdd4VPPqNZ2IrNd4ILmc0a7khg=; b=DZ/LlP+R7KsAxSBCja/ggUUfV wJuLsX1kYHUvvypX8vGur6aa62/HKkTqsitowJLWElw7HiHHi0RaHtl1tppZbCDBDyzPDho63UScX s7VZ40pf8Cz3dyukOF3vHqnJ92i3zh9i4ryYeYiMxpZZ/aVvbx+1oy8jN50c3njdJP51VsckaUKy3 i31028MGgjR4RghurB+ohcfgwBI6iqTvvG0FmQ7L7CMEWiFYrutn/LT7V23Z15x2Br6Po3PFnxWfo ZD1xtKSS0YX1iWAGr4YwgGtfWN8hNiXMi3E90aoN3pSNVDYZunBooats+URzwAAahsALSjN/27tha eippWJ0Ag==; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1hEVQG-0005pX-Eg; Thu, 11 Apr 2019 08:51:04 +0000 Received: from szxga07-in.huawei.com ([45.249.212.35] helo=huawei.com) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.90_1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1hEVQC-0005lm-0V for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Thu, 11 Apr 2019 08:51:02 +0000 Received: from DGGEMS414-HUB.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.58]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id 073424CF2D10F64DF067; Thu, 11 Apr 2019 16:50:54 +0800 (CST) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (10.202.227.238) by DGGEMS414-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.214) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.408.0; Thu, 11 Apr 2019 16:50:46 +0800 Subject: Re: [PATCH] driver core: Postpone DMA tear-down until after devres release for probe failure To: Greg KH , References: <1553767685-27077-1-git-send-email-john.garry@huawei.com> <703aca1f-9475-b50d-624a-5f1ceea2c3b2@huawei.com> <20190403081433.GA13222@kroah.com> <3e1f3e2e-a1d3-ecaf-0931-44b4c10faffe@huawei.com> From: John Garry Message-ID: Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2019 09:50:40 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: X-Originating-IP: [10.202.227.238] X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20190411_015100_220200_3F8D0404 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 16.71 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: robh@kernel.org, chenxiang66@hisilicon.com, rafael@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxarm@huawei.com, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, geert@linux-m68k.org, hch@lst.de, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On 04/04/2019 12:17, John Garry wrote: > On 03/04/2019 10:20, John Garry wrote: >> On 03/04/2019 09:14, Greg KH wrote: >>> On Wed, Apr 03, 2019 at 09:02:36AM +0100, John Garry wrote: >>>> On 28/03/2019 10:08, John Garry wrote: >>>>> In commit 376991db4b64 ("driver core: Postpone DMA tear-down until >>>>> after >>>>> devres release"), we changed the ordering of tearing down the device >>>>> DMA >>>>> ops and releasing all the device's resources; this was because the >>>>> DMA ops >>>>> should be maintained until we release the device's managed DMA >>>>> memories. >>>>> >>>> >>>> Hi all, >>>> >>>> A friendly reminder on this patch... I didn't see any update. >>>> >>>> I thought that it had some importance. >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> John >>>> >>>>> However, we have seen another crash on an arm64 system when a >>>>> device driver probe fails: >>>>> >>>>> hisi_sas_v3_hw 0000:74:02.0: Adding to iommu group 2 >>>>> scsi host1: hisi_sas_v3_hw >>>>> BUG: Bad page state in process swapper/0 pfn:313f5 >>>>> page:ffff7e0000c4fd40 count:1 mapcount:0 >>>>> mapping:0000000000000000 index:0x0 >>>>> flags: 0xfffe00000001000(reserved) >>>>> raw: 0fffe00000001000 ffff7e0000c4fd48 ffff7e0000c4fd48 >>>>> 0000000000000000 >>>>> raw: 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 00000001ffffffff >>>>> 0000000000000000 >>>>> page dumped because: PAGE_FLAGS_CHECK_AT_FREE flag(s) set >>>>> bad because of flags: 0x1000(reserved) >>>>> Modules linked in: >>>>> CPU: 49 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted >>>>> 5.1.0-rc1-43081-g22d97fd-dirty #1433 >>>>> Hardware name: Huawei D06/D06, BIOS Hisilicon D06 UEFI >>>>> RC0 - V1.12.01 01/29/2019 >>>>> Call trace: >>>>> dump_backtrace+0x0/0x118 >>>>> show_stack+0x14/0x1c >>>>> dump_stack+0xa4/0xc8 >>>>> bad_page+0xe4/0x13c >>>>> free_pages_check_bad+0x4c/0xc0 >>>>> __free_pages_ok+0x30c/0x340 >>>>> __free_pages+0x30/0x44 >>>>> __dma_direct_free_pages+0x30/0x38 >>>>> dma_direct_free+0x24/0x38 >>>>> dma_free_attrs+0x9c/0xd8 >>>>> dmam_release+0x20/0x28 >>>>> release_nodes+0x17c/0x220 >>>>> devres_release_all+0x34/0x54 >>>>> really_probe+0xc4/0x2c8 >>>>> driver_probe_device+0x58/0xfc >>>>> device_driver_attach+0x68/0x70 >>>>> __driver_attach+0x94/0xdc >>>>> bus_for_each_dev+0x5c/0xb4 >>>>> driver_attach+0x20/0x28 >>>>> bus_add_driver+0x14c/0x200 >>>>> driver_register+0x6c/0x124 >>>>> __pci_register_driver+0x48/0x50 >>>>> sas_v3_pci_driver_init+0x20/0x28 >>>>> do_one_initcall+0x40/0x25c >>>>> kernel_init_freeable+0x2b8/0x3c0 >>>>> kernel_init+0x10/0x100 >>>>> ret_from_fork+0x10/0x18 >>>>> Disabling lock debugging due to kernel taint >>>>> BUG: Bad page state in process swapper/0 pfn:313f6 >>>>> page:ffff7e0000c4fd80 count:1 mapcount:0 >>>>> mapping:0000000000000000 index:0x0 >>>>> [ 89.322983] flags: 0xfffe00000001000(reserved) >>>>> raw: 0fffe00000001000 ffff7e0000c4fd88 ffff7e0000c4fd88 >>>>> 0000000000000000 >>>>> raw: 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 00000001ffffffff >>>>> 0000000000000000 >>>>> >>>>> The crash occurs for the same reason. >>>>> >>>>> In this case, on the really_probe() failure path, we are still >>>>> clearing >>>>> the DMA ops prior to releasing the device's managed memories. >>>>> >>>>> This patch fixes this issue by reordering the DMA ops teardown and the >>>>> call to devres_release_all() on the failure path. >>>>> >>>>> Reported-by: Xiang Chen >>>>> Tested-by: Xiang Chen >>>>> Signed-off-by: John Garry >>> >>> So does this "fix" 376991db4b64? If so, should this be added to the >>> patch and also backported to the stable trees? >> >> Hi Greg, >> >> No, I don't think so. I'd say it supplements it. Here I'm trying to fix >> up another path in which we tear down the DMA ops prior to releasing the >> device's resources. >> >> I didn't add a fixes tag as 376991db4b64 didn't have one either. It will >> need to be backported to stable, I figure the same as 376991db4b64. > Hi Greg, I still think that we should consider merging this patch. Thanks, John > So 376991db4b64 required manual backporting to stable, and this patch > would require the same: > > https://www.spinics.net/lists/stable/msg289685.html > > Robin, any further comment? > > Thanks, > John > > >>> thanks, >>> >>> greg k-h >>> >>> . >>> >> > _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel