From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.0 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82052C433DF for ; Wed, 29 Jul 2020 08:03:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from merlin.infradead.org (merlin.infradead.org [205.233.59.134]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4EB62207F5 for ; Wed, 29 Jul 2020 08:03:36 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="Ydgbb5iY" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 4EB62207F5 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=pengutronix.de Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=merlin.20170209; h=Sender:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To:Date:To:From: Subject:Message-ID:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=Xm0mKd5DfcYcp8N/eavnSmGEtVDg4kzRtM+7ZQ7Cm2k=; b=Ydgbb5iYUcFaKcQR3w2DLHOMI uDZJU8Lf7JYqR8YvlMw9hIzfj9Bir45feQ0i/TkGXkDaeeSJ3P2vnXm9nZqx2uwnlxcpBCS27b/Zh iL1QnG2s4RX9CuWAbvThrWr7YL32mQxDOMywl2XPPHqg9A+khGfzHei/vB1TM838Y4KFrFu3IkHi3 5lZoQ1pRvjhav+T9sMbumKmYu47h/jPeJ0bV3BWcW110JEklNeUYSZeu2U6Lb9Z1WP6OR2m01jkkX tZSFSCeFvr0XjtAjk4U63xWLCvMXNq/0ZU/yu4pvY12Lgooo4lNWNGth4fbGth4dZKKl777qpNRSw QpzL218DQ==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=merlin.infradead.org) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1k0h2d-0006hn-17; Wed, 29 Jul 2020 08:02:23 +0000 Received: from metis.ext.pengutronix.de ([2001:67c:670:201:290:27ff:fe1d:cc33]) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1k0h2a-0006gZ-CX for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 29 Jul 2020 08:02:21 +0000 Received: from lupine.hi.pengutronix.de ([2001:67c:670:100:3ad5:47ff:feaf:1a17] helo=lupine) by metis.ext.pengutronix.de with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1k0h2X-00086y-8P; Wed, 29 Jul 2020 10:02:17 +0200 Received: from pza by lupine with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1k0h2W-0001cy-D3; Wed, 29 Jul 2020 10:02:16 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] reset-controller: ti: adjust the reset assert and deassert interface From: Philipp Zabel To: Matthias Brugger , Crystal Guo , robh+dt@kernel.org Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2020 10:02:16 +0200 In-Reply-To: References: <1596008357-11213-1-git-send-email-crystal.guo@mediatek.com> <1596008357-11213-2-git-send-email-crystal.guo@mediatek.com> User-Agent: Evolution 3.30.5-1.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 2001:67c:670:100:3ad5:47ff:feaf:1a17 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: p.zabel@pengutronix.de X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on metis.ext.pengutronix.de); SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-PTX-Original-Recipient: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20200729_040220_461355_AA1481ED X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 24.93 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, srv_heupstream@mediatek.com, seiya.wang@mediatek.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org Hi Crystal, Matthias, On Wed, 2020-07-29 at 09:48 +0200, Matthias Brugger wrote: > > On 29/07/2020 09:39, Crystal Guo wrote: > > Add ti_syscon_reset() to integrate assert and deassert together, > > and change return value of the reset assert and deassert interface > > from regmap_update_bits to regmap_write_bits. > > > > when clear bit is already 1, regmap_update_bits can not write 1 to it again. > > Some IC has the feature that, when set bit is 1, the clear bit change > > to 1 together. It will truly clear bit to 0 by write 1 to the clear bit > > > > Signed-off-by: Crystal Guo > > --- > > drivers/reset/reset-ti-syscon.c | 13 +++++++++++-- > > 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/reset/reset-ti-syscon.c b/drivers/reset/reset-ti-syscon.c > > index a2635c2..5a8ec8f 100644 > > --- a/drivers/reset/reset-ti-syscon.c > > +++ b/drivers/reset/reset-ti-syscon.c > > @@ -89,7 +89,7 @@ static int ti_syscon_reset_assert(struct reset_controller_dev *rcdev, > > mask = BIT(control->assert_bit); > > value = (control->flags & ASSERT_SET) ? mask : 0x0; > > > > - return regmap_update_bits(data->regmap, control->assert_offset, mask, value); > > + return regmap_write_bits(data->regmap, control->assert_offset, mask, value); > > Nack, this will break the driver for the other devices. I don't think this will break the driver for existing hardware. regmap_write_bits() is the same as regmap_update_bits(), it just forces the write in case the read already happens to return the correct value. Of course it would be good to check that this actually works. > The kernel has to work not just for your SoC but for all devices of all > architectures. You can't just hack something up, that will work on your specific > SoC. > > Regards, > Matthias > > > } > > > > /** > > @@ -120,7 +120,7 @@ static int ti_syscon_reset_deassert(struct reset_controller_dev *rcdev, > > mask = BIT(control->deassert_bit); > > value = (control->flags & DEASSERT_SET) ? mask : 0x0; > > > > - return regmap_update_bits(data->regmap, control->deassert_offset, mask, value); > > + return regmap_write_bits(data->regmap, control->deassert_offset, mask, value); > > } > > > > /** > > @@ -158,10 +158,19 @@ static int ti_syscon_reset_status(struct reset_controller_dev *rcdev, > > !(control->flags & STATUS_SET); > > } > > > > +static int ti_syscon_reset(struct reset_controller_dev *rcdev, > > + unsigned long id) > > +{ > > + ti_syscon_reset_assert(rcdev, id); > > + > > + return ti_syscon_reset_deassert(rcdev, id); > > +} > > + I'm unsure about this one, though. This is an incompatible change. At the very least this would have to be optional depending on compatible. regards Philipp _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel