linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dragan Simic <dsimic@manjaro.org>
To: Dragan Simic <dsimic@manjaro.org>
Cc: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>,
	Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@kernel.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 13/18] i2c: rk3x: remove printout on handled timeouts
Date: Sat, 13 Apr 2024 10:07:36 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <d26197a9fd834cd4f35529b5fe67d77c@manjaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4ogowge36wr2lk2zdsv3zc3sm3pjk4h5wmy2hjth734kgsr3rs@lb4wsmkpavnd>

Hello Wolfram,

On 2024-04-13 09:10, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> Hi Dragan,
> 
>> Sure, but I think that having such an additional debug facility
>> can only help and save the people from adding temporary printk()s
>> while debugging.
> 
> Mileages, I guess. I like temporary printouts for temporary debug
> sessions. This way the upstream source code stays slim. In my 
> experience
> with I2C over the years, debugging happens with developers anyhow.
> Logfiles from users which help developers create patches are very rare.
> And those users are usually capable enough to add debug patches.
> Given these experiences (which may be different in other subsystems), I
> don't see why we should carry the bloat.

Yup, adding some printk()s while debugging is pretty much inevitable,
and having full debugging available would add a lot of code, regardless
of the subsystem.

> That said, I'll leave the final decision to the driver maintainers.

Agreed.

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2024-04-13  8:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-04-10 11:24 [PATCH 00/18] i2c: remove printout on handled timeouts Wolfram Sang
2024-04-10 11:24 ` [PATCH 01/18] i2c: at91-master: " Wolfram Sang
2024-04-10 11:24 ` [PATCH 02/18] i2c: bcm-iproc: " Wolfram Sang
2024-04-10 11:24 ` [PATCH 03/18] i2c: bcm2835: " Wolfram Sang
2024-04-10 11:24 ` [PATCH 04/18] i2c: cadence: " Wolfram Sang
2024-04-11  7:09   ` Michal Simek
2024-04-10 11:24 ` [PATCH 05/18] i2c: davinci: " Wolfram Sang
2024-04-10 11:24 ` [PATCH 09/18] i2c: nomadik: " Wolfram Sang
2024-04-12  8:39   ` Linus Walleij
2024-04-10 11:24 ` [PATCH 13/18] i2c: rk3x: " Wolfram Sang
2024-04-11 18:59   ` Heiko Stuebner
2024-04-12 21:12   ` Dragan Simic
2024-04-13  6:38     ` Wolfram Sang
2024-04-13  6:44       ` Dragan Simic
2024-04-13  7:10         ` Wolfram Sang
2024-04-13  8:07           ` Dragan Simic [this message]
2024-04-13  7:58         ` Heiko Stübner
2024-04-13  8:12           ` Dragan Simic
2024-04-13 14:35           ` Wolfram Sang
2024-04-16 19:02             ` Andi Shyti
2024-04-10 11:24 ` [PATCH 15/18] i2c: st: " Wolfram Sang
2024-04-10 11:24 ` [PATCH 17/18] i2c: uniphier-f: " Wolfram Sang
2024-04-10 11:24 ` [PATCH 18/18] i2c: uniphier: " Wolfram Sang
2024-04-22 22:50 ` [PATCH 00/18] i2c: " Andi Shyti
     [not found] ` <ZihNbtiVDkxgUDGk@surfacebook.localdomain>
2024-04-24  9:00   ` Wolfram Sang
2024-04-24 12:41     ` Andy Shevchenko
2024-04-24 12:44       ` Andy Shevchenko
2024-04-27 18:03         ` Wolfram Sang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=d26197a9fd834cd4f35529b5fe67d77c@manjaro.org \
    --to=dsimic@manjaro.org \
    --cc=andi.shyti@kernel.org \
    --cc=heiko@sntech.de \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).