From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: ashwinc@codeaurora.org (ashwinc at codeaurora.org)
Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2014 15:08:23 -0000
Subject: [PATCH v5 18/18] Documentation: ACPI for ARM64
In-Reply-To: <54A3B526.9040903@linaro.org>
References: <1413553034-20956-1-git-send-email-hanjun.guo@linaro.org>
 <1413553034-20956-19-git-send-email-hanjun.guo@linaro.org>
 <CAJ5Y-eZ5cu9_OhG24yAv+CZq7zKg0vU+eVGekyN+9dDzaz1OhQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <8fc9550c96a468b3e50d51a37db68a33.squirrel@www.codeaurora.org>
 <54A3B526.9040903@linaro.org>
Message-ID: <d3ea3f18e4d9ca9c623e3632129caee6.squirrel@www.codeaurora.org>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On 31 December 2014 at 03:34, Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org> wrote:
> On 2014???12???31??? 04:13, ashwinc at codeaurora.org wrote:
>> Hi Hanjun,
>>> +ASWG
>>> +----
>>> +The following areas are not yet fully defined for ARM in the 5.1
>>> version
>>> +of the ACPI specification and are expected to be worked through in the
>>> +UEFI ACPI Specification Working Group (ASWG):
>>> +
>>> +   -- ACPI based CPU topology
>>> +   -- ACPI based Power management
>>
>> Should clarify this to idle management rather than generic power
>> management.
>
> and I think it is CPU idle specific here, right?
>

Right.

Thanks,
Ashwin

--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project

--