From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1C65FC433F5 for ; Fri, 20 May 2022 12:32:47 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:From:References:Cc:To: Subject:MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=FGLmhTvRNABnLhLeYHhx1N/XTo+ZaJbvFJKGAGWArOY=; b=hJvyIzQV9Jcy1t 9BO185MM7sQ3VC/Enc4qYdz/8NWbPewmwwrN8h5+bzhUbfd3JVk2o/lZ5EGRKJCS6gmZY69hQIj6Y wAwkwdyxCsQdu6v5ovf/YoUOVspP+frWpL2GCuH2l1aUl8NpoxTRbDYsrUii9Nfnfy5QUcrEQNRvx +aOHa6iNooY+Ft5jax0MMyT1X5jc/QuE/ux0pZrsXIBFJgjy5STa3o4OOljde3TQM50rM29p1J7pj LfRR2fG7d1VuLiRWPgGLbOabhygoZF1/vvgycAwk8yxPjztIxZCWmhbeDGkYHH0oCwWwzIYkWfOJg DXqbBlm5SXU7i9khwpBA==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1ns1nD-00CKmp-SM; Fri, 20 May 2022 12:31:43 +0000 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1ns1nB-00CKla-BQ; Fri, 20 May 2022 12:31:42 +0000 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9AF1C1477; Fri, 20 May 2022 05:31:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [172.29.1.145] (unknown [172.31.20.19]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A6CB23F718; Fri, 20 May 2022 05:31:33 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Fri, 20 May 2022 14:31:24 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.8.1 Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/8] arch_topology: Don't set cluster identifier as physical package identifier Content-Language: en-US To: Sudeep Holla , Atish Patra , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Atish Patra , Vincent Guittot , Morten Rasmussen , Qing Wang , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, Rob Herring References: <20220518093325.2070336-1-sudeep.holla@arm.com> <20220518093325.2070336-2-sudeep.holla@arm.com> From: Dietmar Eggemann In-Reply-To: <20220518093325.2070336-2-sudeep.holla@arm.com> X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20220520_053141_478805_DE2740A0 X-CRM114-Status: UNSURE ( 4.33 ) X-CRM114-Notice: Please train this message. X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On 18/05/2022 11:33, Sudeep Holla wrote: You say `cluster identifier` which to me refers to `cpu_topology[cpu].cluster_id`. But I guess you meant `cluster node` from cpu-map DT node? Otherwise you say we link (1.level) cpu-map cluster nodes to `cluster_id\_sibling`? But then (1) we will never support nested clusters and (2) why would we need llc support then? [...] _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel