public inbox for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
To: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
	Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
	Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>,
	Alexandre Ghiti <alex@ghiti.fr>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
	Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com>,
	Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>,
	"Liam R. Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@oracle.com>,
	Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
	Harry Yoo <harry.yoo@oracle.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] mm: Remove arch_flush_tlb_batched_pending() arch helper
Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2025 11:52:20 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <d54e8129-b2dd-480e-b665-91a7f6a20cab@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250609103132.447370-1-ryan.roberts@arm.com>



On 09/06/25 4:01 PM, Ryan Roberts wrote:
> Since commit 4b634918384c ("arm64/mm: Close theoretical race where stale
> TLB entry remains valid"), all arches that use tlbbatch for reclaim
> (arm64, riscv, x86) implement arch_flush_tlb_batched_pending() with a
> flush_tlb_mm().
> 
> So let's simplify by removing the unnecessary abstraction and doing the
> flush_tlb_mm() directly in flush_tlb_batched_pending(). This effectively
> reverts commit db6c1f6f236d ("mm/tlbbatch: introduce
> arch_flush_tlb_batched_pending()").
> 
> Suggested-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>

Makes sense to replace arch callbacks with common generic functions
applicable for all platforms.

Reviewed-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>


> ---
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/tlbflush.h | 11 -----------
>  arch/riscv/include/asm/tlbflush.h |  1 -
>  arch/riscv/mm/tlbflush.c          |  5 -----
>  arch/x86/include/asm/tlbflush.h   |  5 -----
>  mm/rmap.c                         |  2 +-
>  5 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 23 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/tlbflush.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/tlbflush.h
> index aa9efee17277..18a5dc0c9a54 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/tlbflush.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/tlbflush.h
> @@ -322,17 +322,6 @@ static inline bool arch_tlbbatch_should_defer(struct mm_struct *mm)
>  	return true;
>  }
> 
> -/*
> - * If mprotect/munmap/etc occurs during TLB batched flushing, we need to ensure
> - * all the previously issued TLBIs targeting mm have completed. But since we
> - * can be executing on a remote CPU, a DSB cannot guarantee this like it can
> - * for arch_tlbbatch_flush(). Our only option is to flush the entire mm.
> - */
> -static inline void arch_flush_tlb_batched_pending(struct mm_struct *mm)
> -{
> -	flush_tlb_mm(mm);
> -}
> -
>  /*
>   * To support TLB batched flush for multiple pages unmapping, we only send
>   * the TLBI for each page in arch_tlbbatch_add_pending() and wait for the
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/tlbflush.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/tlbflush.h
> index 1a20dd746a49..eed0abc40514 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/tlbflush.h
> +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/tlbflush.h
> @@ -63,7 +63,6 @@ void flush_pud_tlb_range(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long start,
>  bool arch_tlbbatch_should_defer(struct mm_struct *mm);
>  void arch_tlbbatch_add_pending(struct arch_tlbflush_unmap_batch *batch,
>  		struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long start, unsigned long end);
> -void arch_flush_tlb_batched_pending(struct mm_struct *mm);
>  void arch_tlbbatch_flush(struct arch_tlbflush_unmap_batch *batch);
> 
>  extern unsigned long tlb_flush_all_threshold;
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/mm/tlbflush.c b/arch/riscv/mm/tlbflush.c
> index e737ba7949b1..8404530ec00f 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/mm/tlbflush.c
> +++ b/arch/riscv/mm/tlbflush.c
> @@ -234,11 +234,6 @@ void arch_tlbbatch_add_pending(struct arch_tlbflush_unmap_batch *batch,
>  	mmu_notifier_arch_invalidate_secondary_tlbs(mm, start, end);
>  }
> 
> -void arch_flush_tlb_batched_pending(struct mm_struct *mm)
> -{
> -	flush_tlb_mm(mm);
> -}
> -
>  void arch_tlbbatch_flush(struct arch_tlbflush_unmap_batch *batch)
>  {
>  	__flush_tlb_range(NULL, &batch->cpumask,
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/tlbflush.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/tlbflush.h
> index e9b81876ebe4..00daedfefc1b 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/tlbflush.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/tlbflush.h
> @@ -356,11 +356,6 @@ static inline void arch_tlbbatch_add_pending(struct arch_tlbflush_unmap_batch *b
>  	mmu_notifier_arch_invalidate_secondary_tlbs(mm, 0, -1UL);
>  }
> 
> -static inline void arch_flush_tlb_batched_pending(struct mm_struct *mm)
> -{
> -	flush_tlb_mm(mm);
> -}
> -
>  extern void arch_tlbbatch_flush(struct arch_tlbflush_unmap_batch *batch);
> 
>  static inline bool pte_flags_need_flush(unsigned long oldflags,
> diff --git a/mm/rmap.c b/mm/rmap.c
> index fb63d9256f09..fd160ddaa980 100644
> --- a/mm/rmap.c
> +++ b/mm/rmap.c
> @@ -746,7 +746,7 @@ void flush_tlb_batched_pending(struct mm_struct *mm)
>  	int flushed = batch >> TLB_FLUSH_BATCH_FLUSHED_SHIFT;
> 
>  	if (pending != flushed) {
> -		arch_flush_tlb_batched_pending(mm);
> +		flush_tlb_mm(mm);
>  		/*
>  		 * If the new TLB flushing is pending during flushing, leave
>  		 * mm->tlb_flush_batched as is, to avoid losing flushing.
> --
> 2.43.0
> 
> 



  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-06-10  6:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-06-09 10:31 [PATCH v1] mm: Remove arch_flush_tlb_batched_pending() arch helper Ryan Roberts
2025-06-09 10:45 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-06-09 11:01   ` Ryan Roberts
2025-06-12 17:17     ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-06-10  6:22 ` Anshuman Khandual [this message]
2025-06-10 10:37 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-06-12 15:20 ` Will Deacon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=d54e8129-b2dd-480e-b665-91a7f6a20cab@arm.com \
    --to=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
    --cc=Liam.Howlett@oracle.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=alex@ghiti.fr \
    --cc=aou@eecs.berkeley.edu \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=harry.yoo@oracle.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
    --cc=paul.walmsley@sifive.com \
    --cc=riel@surriel.com \
    --cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox