From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 438E5C433F5 for ; Wed, 2 Mar 2022 15:41:34 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Date: Message-ID:From:References:Cc:To:Subject:Reply-To:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=BvKXclbEV+x289hbO4eRdqCwhdSjbM7BkItwGsehuLw=; b=dTLn7BSblIRopG7nXpOtsSavzZ bbGQ/T9xLNbzK+r7NhH/dk/hdJR5+Gm9CPiqqAHC1drSU3GV/KLFQTROLLFDQs7QiHT1kX63vZAPe 15kNAix688q+WS68ajO+wdAczkI93tzSRM8r7xWep1gLREgVjfoFZ8BZRWVjbJCpJevVpLDZeJ23+ 75wsar0zoM64vefkIDvkseCzD7elmPdoNn+q6asFD4OvXFgUKhjzFD9Cp8SIxT3lf8nmTJvsHOvdX +8Pzt6x0AkCQbWxHXYzALRTa2tEftOsn8XdyYel6NOo6kGRsYjpfzW3pjuh3d4wedb5WgBMcTPpFa 7s9k04DA==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1nPR5E-003CTf-Hb; Wed, 02 Mar 2022 15:40:08 +0000 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1nPR5A-003CSf-TA for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 02 Mar 2022 15:40:06 +0000 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4857A13D5; Wed, 2 Mar 2022 07:40:02 -0800 (PST) Received: from [10.1.26.154] (e127744.cambridge.arm.com [10.1.26.154]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6ACAE3F73D; Wed, 2 Mar 2022 07:39:58 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] perf mem: Support HITM for when mem_lvl_num is used To: Ali Saidi , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, leo.yan@linaro.org Cc: benh@kernel.crashing.org, Peter Zijlstra , Ingo Molnar , Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , Mark Rutland , Alexander Shishkin , Jiri Olsa , Namhyung Kim , John Garry , Will Deacon , Mathieu Poirier , James Clark , Andrew Kilroy , Jin Yao , Kajol Jain , Li Huafei References: <20220221224807.18172-1-alisaidi@amazon.com> <20220221224807.18172-2-alisaidi@amazon.com> From: German Gomez Message-ID: Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2022 15:39:04 +0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.14.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20220221224807.18172-2-alisaidi@amazon.com> Content-Language: en-US X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20220302_074005_078266_AF5DB8A2 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 26.10 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On 21/02/2022 22:48, Ali Saidi wrote: > Current code only support HITM statistics for last level cache (LLC) > when mem_lvl encodes the level. On existing Arm64 machines there are as > many as four levels cache and this change supports decoding l1, l2, and > llc hits from the mem_lvl_num data. Given that the mem_lvl namespace is > being deprecated take this opportunity to encode the neoverse data into > mem_lvl_num. Since Neoverse is mentioned in the commit message, I think there should be a comment somewhere in the code as well. > > For loads that hit in a the LLC snoop filter and are fullfilled from a > higher level cache, it's not usually clear what the true level of the > cache the data came from (i.e. a transfer from a core could come from > it's L1 or L2). Instead of making an assumption of where the line came > from, add support for incrementing HITM if the source is CACHE_ANY. > > Since other architectures don't seem to populate the mem_lvl_num field > here there shouldn't be a change in functionality. > > Signed-off-by: Ali Saidi > --- > tools/perf/util/mem-events.c | 14 ++++++++++---- > 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/tools/perf/util/mem-events.c b/tools/perf/util/mem-events.c > index ed0ab838bcc5..6c3fd4aac7ae 100644 > --- a/tools/perf/util/mem-events.c > +++ b/tools/perf/util/mem-events.c > @@ -485,6 +485,7 @@ int c2c_decode_stats(struct c2c_stats *stats, struct mem_info *mi) > u64 daddr = mi->daddr.addr; > u64 op = data_src->mem_op; > u64 lvl = data_src->mem_lvl; > + u64 lnum = data_src->mem_lvl_num; > u64 snoop = data_src->mem_snoop; > u64 lock = data_src->mem_lock; > u64 blk = data_src->mem_blk; > @@ -527,16 +528,18 @@ do { \ > if (lvl & P(LVL, UNC)) stats->ld_uncache++; > if (lvl & P(LVL, IO)) stats->ld_io++; > if (lvl & P(LVL, LFB)) stats->ld_fbhit++; > - if (lvl & P(LVL, L1 )) stats->ld_l1hit++; > - if (lvl & P(LVL, L2 )) stats->ld_l2hit++; > - if (lvl & P(LVL, L3 )) { > + if (lvl & P(LVL, L1) || lnum == P(LVLNUM, L1)) > + stats->ld_l1hit++; > + if (lvl & P(LVL, L2) || lnum == P(LVLNUM, L2)) > + stats->ld_l2hit++; > + if (lvl & P(LVL, L3) || lnum == P(LVLNUM, L4)) { According to a comment in the previous patch, using L4 is specific to Neoverse, right? Maybe we need to distinguish the Neoverse case from the generic one here as well if (is_neoverse) // treat L4 as llc else // treat L3 as llc > if (snoop & P(SNOOP, HITM)) > HITM_INC(lcl_hitm); > else > stats->ld_llchit++; > } > > - if (lvl & P(LVL, LOC_RAM)) { > + if (lvl & P(LVL, LOC_RAM) || lnum == P(LVLNUM, RAM)) { > stats->lcl_dram++; > if (snoop & P(SNOOP, HIT)) > stats->ld_shared++; > @@ -564,6 +567,9 @@ do { \ > HITM_INC(rmt_hitm); > } > > + if (lnum == P(LVLNUM, ANY_CACHE) && snoop & P(SNOOP, HITM)) > + HITM_INC(lcl_hitm); > + > if ((lvl & P(LVL, MISS))) > stats->ld_miss++; > _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel