From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0978CC43334 for ; Wed, 6 Jul 2022 16:28:55 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:From:References:Cc:To:Subject: MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=NCWmmapNsnEWf6sz0HG77QcSsbUk71TOZN+KE/F0SaE=; b=TgW2CgsxcFgzdW T5FkWy3+5Ta1PPL4KDFP/32wXFGBEVk7JNJ8zSOqByLECLLj7XbnloZC9iO6tA9gUmW9QJSUGGAxQ c6b3f1scViKp6I5RQ9eCAnbueImQ0qTAnzrKXQHL2KGANtct1ODH5MmiAo1dAB4m9hndpaBGgCpdF HxfywnruLyWVGlH0cTplAaI6SpjdGJZwZ9hm0WI1MRZ5JFyqzYNfdyMa0wtLzKj5+OTjoJh4cBjrx UWujfP3FIumb2Tawc+6E9V79eC6FvptmuFfJtPkheGSzFP2X2aQupFq/28mIuIcj7btqVqbjxBWRg vTngg6pTyFP6Pbsq1Mbw==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1o97sT-00BLMB-JX; Wed, 06 Jul 2022 16:27:49 +0000 Received: from mail-qt1-x833.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::833]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1o97sB-00BLEP-C5; Wed, 06 Jul 2022 16:27:32 +0000 Received: by mail-qt1-x833.google.com with SMTP id ay10so18944393qtb.1; Wed, 06 Jul 2022 09:27:28 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=message-id:date:mime-version:user-agent:subject:content-language:to :cc:references:from:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=OfBOZ4y4VnJEQETKJF+v25EGknGkkpD71yB8k2rSVjs=; b=Yfd6+mK6INo6uKnYDW80dmEpedZOkuslw2TkBnxzeEW6OORavuQnZURlsBlpBEQNm7 9+YWS0ILQ3wvudBDbglPFLtAA6tE/u0wOCZ75+XjYtjBTRwSODMobr0sWCAK8yvUgdCg KcoDvJY7WgVLn86syRy2yMRLMJ1rHyp9cmhjFj0uRueEKAi2fhe2eaQHPtMXDl9QzwgD MMuQcx0TAC/lRM663n/GJ/10eHOhJdoVJURqmO0KLr02ccEpcsLB2O8i/wVxXHxhc9zl r+2RAQMsZJgmk+/e45R9BzXyyVtpCIk1mvKPai60Tth9QxhpNiPl0o7/OseY/Hmhc2j0 x+Yg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:mime-version:user-agent:subject :content-language:to:cc:references:from:in-reply-to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=OfBOZ4y4VnJEQETKJF+v25EGknGkkpD71yB8k2rSVjs=; b=YFtj/xLDvibO5GiVJX5IwKrsybiyAQF5tjaKLjgangDQI/GwY0TNUvlQR32TM2nZqK 7VkJTTshQO43XMTZ1457ec/1sIdnMAsVf1bXoTUOAVdSwTKD31hQZt7tg6o8rwYxoWxv EDMkiSP/pLsaNM7u4z0uMmCEdLiWxkdwsvjI1GFns5P3v5Oe/tJXoNGs0+jZMZ7DAf+n kOzTyDshDpUQYEr9LOJFrr5tM446DzZVC+dSon1nUDtcnqfE0RP6ZAFFHToLTvXq7ZbA 4VjJgrtzUvD7fyKnPZ1/1MXOOYmSzLboIu/w+PMSVQoJ7pZ2gFJtplUMvrPRjyMNU9C2 p0Ug== X-Gm-Message-State: AJIora/SJ5MQ7X9vfqxFkx3ZqA6GkyEZSWh5xhKjmrNFEw7az2ypwpig Yltl/HWiNSCuVT/aLkxz7j0= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGRyM1tAF5bodD68xq2eUzGaMDiXpqw7KsTWSdoSBoqsGCJmgiwePaU5v3cgVMfITlfbVFQAUUpBgA== X-Received: by 2002:ac8:570d:0:b0:31d:3d2a:c4b8 with SMTP id 13-20020ac8570d000000b0031d3d2ac4b8mr20898986qtw.61.1657124847975; Wed, 06 Jul 2022 09:27:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.67.48.245] ([192.19.223.252]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id dt51-20020a05620a47b300b006b539412be3sm1678621qkb.26.2022.07.06.09.27.22 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 06 Jul 2022 09:27:27 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2022 09:27:20 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.9.1 Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC net-next v2 0/5] net: dsa: always use phylink Content-Language: en-US To: Vladimir Oltean Cc: "Russell King (Oracle)" , Andrew Lunn , Heiner Kallweit , Alexandre Belloni , =?UTF-8?Q?Alvin_=c5=a0ipraga?= , Claudiu Manoil , "David S. Miller" , DENG Qingfang , Eric Dumazet , George McCollister , Hauke Mehrtens , Jakub Kicinski , Kurt Kanzenbach , Landen Chao , Linus Walleij , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, Matthias Brugger , netdev@vger.kernel.org, Paolo Abeni , Sean Wang , UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com, Vivien Didelot , Woojung Huh References: <7fe6b661-06b9-96dd-e064-1db23a9eaae7@gmail.com> <20220706101459.tahby2xpm3e7okjz@skbuf> From: Florian Fainelli In-Reply-To: <20220706101459.tahby2xpm3e7okjz@skbuf> X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20220706_092731_505671_3C5DCF63 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 17.08 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On 7/6/22 03:14, Vladimir Oltean wrote: > Hi Florian, > > On Tue, Jul 05, 2022 at 09:42:33AM -0700, Florian Fainelli wrote: >> On 7/5/22 02:46, Russell King (Oracle) wrote: >>> A new revision of the series which incorporates changes that Marek >>> suggested. Specifically, the changes are: >>> >>> 1. Patch 2 - use the phylink_get_caps method in mv88e6xxx to get the >>> default interface rather than re-using port_max_speed_mode() >>> >>> 2. Patch 4 - if no default interface is provided, use the supported >>> interface mask to search for the first interface that gives the >>> fastest speed. >>> >>> 3. Patch 5 - now also removes the port_max_speed_mode() method >> >> This was tested with bcm_sf2.c and b53_srab.b and did not cause regressions, >> however we do have a 'fixed-link' property for the CPU port (always have had >> one), so there was no regression expected. > > What about arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm47189-tenda-ac9.dts? You found one of the devices that I do not have access to and did not test, thanks. We do expect to run the port at 2GBits/sec on these devices however there is no "official" way to advertise that a port can run at 2Gbits/sec, as this is not even a "sanctioned" speed. I do have a similar device however, so let me run some more tests, we won't see a regression however since we do not use the NATP accelerator which would be the reason to run the port at 2Gbits/sec. -- Florian _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel