From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: javier@osg.samsung.com (Javier Martinez Canillas) Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2017 11:57:37 -0300 Subject: [PATCH 3/4] arm64: dts: exynos: make tm2 and tm2e independent from each other In-Reply-To: <20170103144056.4ft2ohmhgmezeney@jack.zhora.eu> References: <1483430237-26823-1-git-send-email-jcsing.lee@samsung.com> <1483430237-26823-4-git-send-email-jcsing.lee@samsung.com> <20170103095842.h3hl64amje4qv4ts@gangnam.samsung> <20170103102548.73jg6qddlcthe2mu@gangnam.samsung> <20170103115530.zhjwn7bzmqmumy23@gangnam.samsung> <20170103144056.4ft2ohmhgmezeney@jack.zhora.eu> Message-ID: To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Hello Andi, On 01/03/2017 11:40 AM, Andi Shyti wrote: > Hi, > >> FWIW, I also agree with Chanwoo that the difference is too small to >> need a common .dtsi file. > > in principle I don't like "switching on and off" properties by > overwriting them with "status = disable", unless it's really This is a very good point. It would had been different if it was the opposite and tm2e had to enable the device node, but disabling it is indeed more confusing. Best regards, -- Javier Martinez Canillas Open Source Group Samsung Research America