From: santosh.shilimkar@ti.com (Santosh Shilimkar)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 1/5] ARM: omap4: Correct definition of do_wfi() forCONFIG_THUMB2_KERNEL
Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2011 01:00:46 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <d813cf9e0b404d0243c3973841baa6dc@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110203190758.GA15004@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Russell King - ARM Linux [mailto:linux at arm.linux.org.uk]
> Sent: Friday, February 04, 2011 12:38 AM
> To: Santosh Shilimkar
> Cc: Dave Martin; linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org; Tony
> Lindgren; Nicolas Pitre; linux-omap at vger.kernel.org; Jean Pihet-XID
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] ARM: omap4: Correct definition of
> do_wfi() forCONFIG_THUMB2_KERNEL
>
> On Fri, Feb 04, 2011 at 12:09:34AM +0530, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Dave Martin [mailto:dave.martin at linaro.org]
> > > Sent: Thursday, February 03, 2011 11:33 PM
> > > To: linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org
> > > Cc: Dave Martin; Tony Lindgren; Santosh Shilimkar; Jean Pihet;
> > > linux-omap at vger.kernel.org; Nicolas Pitre
> > > Subject: [PATCH v2 1/5] ARM: omap4: Correct definition of
> do_wfi()
> > > for CONFIG_THUMB2_KERNEL
> > >
> > > For the Thumb-2 case, the "wfi" mnemonic is used, since in this
> > > case the tools will necessarily be new enough to support it.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Dave Martin <dave.martin@linaro.org>
> >
> > I guess, we discussed this patch in your previous post.
> > Acked-by: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>
> >
> > > ---
> > > arch/arm/mach-omap2/include/mach/omap4-common.h | 5 +++++
> > > 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/include/mach/omap4-common.h
> > > b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/include/mach/omap4-common.h
> > > index 5b0270b..68ce058 100644
> > > --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/include/mach/omap4-common.h
> > > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/include/mach/omap4-common.h
> > > @@ -17,8 +17,13 @@
> > > * wfi used in low power code. Directly opcode is used instead
> > > * of instruction to avoid mulit-omap build break
> > > */
> > > +#ifdef CONFIG_THUMB2_KERNEL
> > > +#define do_wfi() \
> > > + __asm__ __volatile__ ("wfi" : : : "memory")
> > > +#else
> > > #define do_wfi() \
> > > __asm__ __volatile__ (".word 0xe320f003" : : :
> > > "memory")
> > > +#endif
>
> We actually have this:
>
> #if __LINUX_ARM_ARCH__ >= 7 || \
> (__LINUX_ARM_ARCH__ == 6 && defined(CONFIG_CPU_32v6K))
> #define sev() __asm__ __volatile__ ("sev" : : : "memory")
> #define wfe() __asm__ __volatile__ ("wfe" : : : "memory")
> #define wfi() __asm__ __volatile__ ("wfi" : : : "memory")
> #endif
>
> in asm/system.h, so maybe it should be using wfe() from asm/system.h
> ?
I assume you mean wfi here.
The problem is, omap2plus build breaks because it builds
CPU_32v6 and CPU_32v7 as well which doesn't support the wfi
instruction. Hence I used opcode directly to keep build
working.
Regards,
Santosh
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-02-03 19:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-02-03 18:02 [PATCH v2 0/5] ARM: omap[34]: Thumb-2 compatibility fixes Dave Martin
2011-02-03 18:02 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] ARM: omap4: Correct definition of do_wfi() for CONFIG_THUMB2_KERNEL Dave Martin
2011-02-03 18:39 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2011-02-03 19:07 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-02-03 19:30 ` Santosh Shilimkar [this message]
2011-02-04 10:58 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] ARM: omap4: Correct definition of do_wfi() forCONFIG_THUMB2_KERNEL Dave Martin
2011-02-04 11:18 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2011-02-03 18:02 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] ARM: omap4: Convert END() to ENDPROC() for correct linkage with CONFIG_THUMB2_KERNEL Dave Martin
2011-02-03 18:02 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] ARM: omap3: Remove hand-encoded SMC instructions Dave Martin
2011-02-03 18:38 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2011-02-03 18:02 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] ARM: omap3: Thumb-2 compatibility for sram34xx.S Dave Martin
2011-02-03 18:42 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2011-02-03 18:02 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] ARM: omap3: Thumb-2 compatibility for sleep34xx.S Dave Martin
2011-02-03 18:47 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2011-02-10 22:17 ` Kevin Hilman
2011-02-11 0:07 ` Kevin Hilman
2011-02-11 13:49 ` Dave Martin
2011-02-11 9:43 ` Dave Martin
2011-02-04 10:45 ` [PATCH v2 0/5] ARM: omap[34]: Thumb-2 compatibility fixes Santosh Shilimkar
2011-02-04 11:02 ` Dave Martin
2011-02-04 11:16 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2011-02-04 11:18 ` Dave Martin
2011-02-04 16:41 ` Dave Martin
2011-02-08 17:40 ` Dave Martin
2011-02-09 5:45 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2011-02-09 9:49 ` Dave Martin
2011-02-10 21:38 ` Kevin Hilman
2011-02-11 9:36 ` Dave Martin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=d813cf9e0b404d0243c3973841baa6dc@mail.gmail.com \
--to=santosh.shilimkar@ti.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).