Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] dt-bindings: ufs: mediatek,ufs: add MT8195 compatible and update clock nodes

["Peter Wang (王信友)" <peter.wang@mediatek.com>]

On Mon, 2025-10-20 at 12:02 +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> 
> Let's quote you again:
> 
> "*In addition*, it will require MediaTek to put in extra
> effort to migrate the kernel. "
> 
> This is ADDITIONAL argument you used. This is what you wrote, this is
> what you claimed to be ADDITIONAL argument.
> 
> In your opinion ADDITIONAL argument is downstream and you still do
> not
> understand why such argument is instant NAK for you as reviewer.
> 
> 
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof

Hi Krzysztof Kozlowski,

I acknowledge that this was indeed a lack of consideration 
on my part, and I must apologize for making such statements.
Nevertheless, I have also clarified that this was not the main
reason for my objection, the actual reason is
"removing these DTS settings will make what was originally
a simple task more complicated."
And then, when I asked you about the main reason and its 
relation to downstream, you just kept repeating “ADDITIONAL.”
Why not address the issue directly and tell me what the 
benefit is of making the code more complicated?

Thanks
Peter