From: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>
To: "Jerome Brunet" <jbrunet@baylibre.com>,
"thierry.reding@gmail.com" <thierry.reding@gmail.com>,
"Uwe Kleine-König" <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>,
"Neil Armstrong" <narmstrong@baylibre.com>,
"Kevin Hilman" <khilman@baylibre.com>,
"Martin Blumenstingl" <martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com>
Cc: linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
"open list:ARM/Amlogic Meson..."
<linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pwm: meson: add support for S4 chip family
Date: Sat, 25 Mar 2023 23:58:24 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <dc311f8c-a394-40fe-a4ca-6ef331d2b56b@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1j5yapot4j.fsf@starbuckisacylon.baylibre.com>
On 25.03.2023 14:24, Jerome Brunet wrote:
>
> On Fri 24 Mar 2023 at 23:23, Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> This adds pwm support for (at least) the s4 chip family. The extension
>> is based on the vendor driver that can be found at [0]. There the
>> version with the new clock handling is called meson-v2-pwm.
>> Central change is that the clock is now fully provided by the SoC clock
>> core. The multiplexer isn't any longer part of the pwm block.
>
> As far as the documentation is concerned this is not true.
> There is a input multiplexer with the xtal, vid_pll, fdiv3 and fdiv4
>
> I'm not sure the differences mentionned here actually exists.
>
I don't have access to a S905X4 datasheet, just to the one for S905X3.
What makes me think that the hw is different:
- In the clock drivers for families before s4 I see no hint that
dedicated pwm clocks exist. From s4 there are CLKID_PWM_... clocks.
- In the S905X3 datasheet I see no hint that the pwm block can be fed
from an external clock (except the standard 4 mux parents).
>>
>> This was tested on a sc2-based system that uses the same pwm block.
>>
>> [0] https://github.com/khadas/linux/blob/khadas-vims-5.4.y/drivers/pwm/pwm-meson.c
>
> AFAICT, this looks more like a choice in vendor SDK to not use the input
> mux. IOW, just SW decision.
>
- If it would be a sw decision to use internal mux/div or an external
clock, then there should be a way to configure whether to use option a or b.
I see no such switch in the vendor driver code. Maybe you can check in the
datasheet whether there's such a switch.
> I don't think such change makes sense in mainline if the HW has not
> actually changed.
>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>
>> ---
>> Adding the amlogic,meson-s4-pwm compatible to the documentation was part
>> of the yaml conversion already.
>> ---
>> drivers/pwm/pwm-meson.c | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
>> 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-meson.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-meson.c
>> index 16d79ca5d..7a93fdada 100644
>> --- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-meson.c
>> +++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-meson.c
>> @@ -98,6 +98,7 @@ struct meson_pwm_channel {
>> struct meson_pwm_data {
>> const char * const *parent_names;
>> unsigned int num_parents;
>> + unsigned int ext_clk:1;
>> };
>>
>> struct meson_pwm {
>> @@ -158,6 +159,7 @@ static int meson_pwm_calc(struct meson_pwm *meson, struct pwm_device *pwm,
>> struct meson_pwm_channel *channel = &meson->channels[pwm->hwpwm];
>> unsigned int duty, period, pre_div, cnt, duty_cnt;
>> unsigned long fin_freq;
>> + int err;
>>
>> duty = state->duty_cycle;
>> period = state->period;
>> @@ -165,6 +167,14 @@ static int meson_pwm_calc(struct meson_pwm *meson, struct pwm_device *pwm,
>> if (state->polarity == PWM_POLARITY_INVERSED)
>> duty = period - duty;
>>
>> + if (meson->data->ext_clk) {
>> + err = clk_set_rate(channel->clk, 0xffffUL * NSEC_PER_SEC / period);
>> + if (err) {
>> + dev_err(meson->chip.dev, "failed to set pwm clock rate\n");
>> + return err;
>> + }
>> + }
>> +
>> fin_freq = clk_get_rate(channel->clk);
>> if (fin_freq == 0) {
>> dev_err(meson->chip.dev, "invalid source clock frequency\n");
>> @@ -173,10 +183,14 @@ static int meson_pwm_calc(struct meson_pwm *meson, struct pwm_device *pwm,
>>
>> dev_dbg(meson->chip.dev, "fin_freq: %lu Hz\n", fin_freq);
>>
>> - pre_div = div64_u64(fin_freq * (u64)period, NSEC_PER_SEC * 0xffffLL);
>> - if (pre_div > MISC_CLK_DIV_MASK) {
>> - dev_err(meson->chip.dev, "unable to get period pre_div\n");
>> - return -EINVAL;
>> + if (meson->data->ext_clk) {
>> + pre_div = 0;
>> + } else {
>> + pre_div = div64_u64(fin_freq * (u64)period, NSEC_PER_SEC * 0xffffLL);
>> + if (pre_div > MISC_CLK_DIV_MASK) {
>> + dev_err(meson->chip.dev, "unable to get period pre_div\n");
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> + }
>> }
>>
>> cnt = div64_u64(fin_freq * (u64)period, NSEC_PER_SEC * (pre_div + 1));
>> @@ -445,6 +459,10 @@ static const struct meson_pwm_data pwm_g12a_ee_data = {
>> .num_parents = ARRAY_SIZE(pwm_g12a_ee_parent_names),
>> };
>>
>> +static const struct meson_pwm_data pwm_s4_data = {
>> + .ext_clk = 1,
>> +};
>> +
>> static const struct of_device_id meson_pwm_matches[] = {
>> {
>> .compatible = "amlogic,meson8b-pwm",
>> @@ -478,6 +496,10 @@ static const struct of_device_id meson_pwm_matches[] = {
>> .compatible = "amlogic,meson-g12a-ao-pwm-cd",
>> .data = &pwm_g12a_ao_cd_data
>> },
>> + {
>> + .compatible = "amlogic,meson-s4-pwm",
>> + .data = &pwm_s4_data
>> + },
>> {},
>> };
>> MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, meson_pwm_matches);
>> @@ -493,6 +515,14 @@ static int meson_pwm_init_channels(struct meson_pwm *meson)
>> for (i = 0; i < meson->chip.npwm; i++) {
>> struct meson_pwm_channel *channel = &meson->channels[i];
>>
>> + if (meson->data->ext_clk) {
>> + snprintf(name, sizeof(name), "clkin%u", i);
>> + channel->clk = devm_clk_get(dev, name);
>> + if (IS_ERR(channel->clk))
>> + return PTR_ERR(channel->clk);
>> + continue;
>> + }
>> +
>> snprintf(name, sizeof(name), "%s#mux%u", dev_name(dev), i);
>>
>> init.name = name;
>
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-03-25 22:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-03-24 22:23 [PATCH] pwm: meson: add support for S4 chip family Heiner Kallweit
2023-03-25 8:20 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2023-03-25 9:43 ` Heiner Kallweit
2023-03-25 13:24 ` Jerome Brunet
2023-03-25 22:58 ` Heiner Kallweit [this message]
2023-03-26 10:02 ` Heiner Kallweit
2023-03-27 12:13 ` Jerome Brunet
2023-03-27 7:33 ` Neil Armstrong
2023-03-27 17:00 ` Heiner Kallweit
2023-03-27 17:50 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2023-03-27 21:14 ` Heiner Kallweit
2023-03-27 18:11 ` neil.armstrong
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=dc311f8c-a394-40fe-a4ca-6ef331d2b56b@gmail.com \
--to=hkallweit1@gmail.com \
--cc=jbrunet@baylibre.com \
--cc=khilman@baylibre.com \
--cc=linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com \
--cc=narmstrong@baylibre.com \
--cc=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
--cc=u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).