From: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
To: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] arm64: Restrict ARM64_ERRATUM_1188873 mitigation to AArch32
Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2019 19:34:49 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <dc92f127-02ba-aa24-215e-6de879c324cd@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190408160216.223871-2-marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Hi Marc,
On 08/04/2019 17:02, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> We currently deal with ARM64_ERRATUM_1188873 by always trapping EL0
> accesses for both instruction sets. Although nothing wrong comes out
> of that, people trying to squeeze the last drop of performance from
> buggy HW find this over the top. Oh well.
>
> Let's change the mitigation by flipping the counter enable bit
> on return to userspace. Non-broken HW gets an extra branch on
> the fast path, which is hopefully not the end of the world.
> The arch timer workaround it also removed.
>
> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
> ---
> arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++++
> drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c | 15 ---------------
> 2 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S b/arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S
> index c50a7a75f2e0..e0aed21ab402 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S
> @@ -336,6 +336,29 @@ alternative_if ARM64_WORKAROUND_845719
> alternative_else_nop_endif
> #endif
> 3:
> +#ifdef CONFIG_ARM64_ERRATUM_1188873
> +alternative_if_not ARM64_WORKAROUND_1188873
> + b 1f
> +alternative_else_nop_endif
> +
> + ubfx x0, x22, #4, #1 // Extract PSR_MODE32
> + eor x0, x0, #1 // Negate it
> +alternative_if_not ARM64_HAS_VIRT_HOST_EXTN
> + mrs x1, cntkctl_el1
> +alternative_else
> + mrs x1, cnthctl_el2
> +alternative_endif
> + ubfx x2, x1, #1, #1 // Extract EL0VCTEN
> + cmp x2, x0
> + b.eq 1f // Matches, nothing to do
> + bfi x1, x0, #1, #1 // Move EL0VCTEN in place
> +alternative_if_not ARM64_HAS_VIRT_HOST_EXTN
> + msr cntkctl_el1, x1
> +alternative_else
> + msr cnthctl_el2, x1
> +alternative_endif
Unless I've gone horribly wrong in my reasoning somewhere, I reckon this
could be a fair bit shorter...
alternative_if_not ARM64_HAS_VIRT_HOST_EXTN
mrs x1, cntkctl_el1
alternative_else
mrs x1, cnthctl_el2
alternative_endif
eon x0, x1, x22, lsr #3
eor x1, x1, #1
tbz x0, #1, 1f
alternative_if_not ARM64_HAS_VIRT_HOST_EXTN
msr cntkctl_el1, x1
alternative_else
msr cnthctl_el2, x1
alternative_endif
...although whether that's a good idea at all probably depends mostly on
how many comments you think it needs :)
Robin.
> +1:
> +#endif
> apply_ssbd 0, x0, x1
> .endif
>
> diff --git a/drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c b/drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c
> index 5fcccc467868..27acc9eb0f7c 100644
> --- a/drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c
> +++ b/drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c
> @@ -339,13 +339,6 @@ static u64 notrace arm64_858921_read_cntvct_el0(void)
> }
> #endif
>
> -#ifdef CONFIG_ARM64_ERRATUM_1188873
> -static u64 notrace arm64_1188873_read_cntvct_el0(void)
> -{
> - return read_sysreg(cntvct_el0);
> -}
> -#endif
> -
> #ifdef CONFIG_SUN50I_ERRATUM_UNKNOWN1
> /*
> * The low bits of the counter registers are indeterminate while bit 10 or
> @@ -476,14 +469,6 @@ static const struct arch_timer_erratum_workaround ool_workarounds[] = {
> .read_cntvct_el0 = arm64_858921_read_cntvct_el0,
> },
> #endif
> -#ifdef CONFIG_ARM64_ERRATUM_1188873
> - {
> - .match_type = ate_match_local_cap_id,
> - .id = (void *)ARM64_WORKAROUND_1188873,
> - .desc = "ARM erratum 1188873",
> - .read_cntvct_el0 = arm64_1188873_read_cntvct_el0,
> - },
> -#endif
> #ifdef CONFIG_SUN50I_ERRATUM_UNKNOWN1
> {
> .match_type = ate_match_dt,
>
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-04-08 18:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-04-08 16:02 [PATCH 0/4] arm64: Rework handling of erratum 1188873 Marc Zyngier
2019-04-08 16:02 ` [PATCH 1/4] arm64: Restrict ARM64_ERRATUM_1188873 mitigation to AArch32 Marc Zyngier
2019-04-08 18:34 ` Robin Murphy [this message]
2019-04-09 9:18 ` Marc Zyngier
2019-04-09 9:49 ` Robin Murphy
2019-04-12 13:17 ` Will Deacon
2019-04-15 8:15 ` Marc Zyngier
2019-04-15 8:26 ` Daniel Lezcano
2019-04-08 16:02 ` [PATCH 2/4] arm64: Make ARM64_ERRATUM_1188873 depend on COMPAT Marc Zyngier
2019-04-08 16:02 ` [PATCH 3/4] arm64: Add part number for Neoverse N1 Marc Zyngier
2019-04-08 16:02 ` [PATCH 4/4] arm64: Apply ARM64_ERRATUM_1188873 to Neoverse-N1 Marc Zyngier
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=dc92f127-02ba-aa24-215e-6de879c324cd@arm.com \
--to=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).