From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
To: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
Cc: Joerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org,
Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iommu/dma: Fix MSI reservation allocation
Date: Tue, 03 Mar 2020 17:33:57 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <dd29d82badfa11f7c0c80563d1b38804@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f0fc18a5-17a9-4c53-052b-00272bbd2691@arm.com>
On 2020-03-03 17:23, Robin Murphy wrote:
> On 03/03/2020 11:51 am, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>> The way cookie_init_hw_msi_region() allocates the iommu_dma_msi_page
>> structures doesn't match the way iommu_put_dma_cookie() frees them.
>>
>> The former performs a single allocation of all the required
>> structures,
>> while the latter tries to free them one at a time. It doesn't quite
>> work for the main use case (the GICv3 ITS where the range is 64kB)
>> when the base ganule size is 4kB.
>>
>> This leads to a nice slab corruption on teardown, which is easily
>> observable by simply creating a VF on a SRIOV-capable device, and
>> tearing it down immediately (no need to even make use of it).
>>
>> Fix it by allocating iommu_dma_msi_page structures one at a time.
>
> Bleh, you know you're supposed to be using 64K pages on those things,
> right? :P
lalalala... ;-)
[...]
>> + if (!msi_page) {
>> + ret = -ENOMEM;
>
> I think we can just return here and skip the cleanup below - by the
> time we get here the cookie itself has already been allocated and
> initialised, so even if iommu_dma_init_domain() fails someone else has
> already accepted the responsibility of calling iommu_put_dma_cookie()
> at some point later, which will clean up properly.
Ah, that's a very good point. I'll refresh the patch with a simplified
error handling.
Thanks,
M.
--
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-03-03 17:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-03-03 11:51 [PATCH] iommu/dma: Fix MSI reservation allocation Marc Zyngier
2020-03-03 12:56 ` Auger Eric
2020-03-03 17:23 ` Robin Murphy
2020-03-03 17:33 ` Marc Zyngier [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=dd29d82badfa11f7c0c80563d1b38804@kernel.org \
--to=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=eric.auger@redhat.com \
--cc=jroedel@suse.de \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).