Linux-ARM-Kernel Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Shiming Cheng (成诗明)" <Shiming.Cheng@mediatek.com>
To: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"dsahern@kernel.org" <dsahern@kernel.org>,
	"imv4bel@gmail.com" <imv4bel@gmail.com>,
	"linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org"
	<linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org>,
	"alice@isovalent.com" <alice@isovalent.com>,
	"daniel.zahka@gmail.com" <daniel.zahka@gmail.com>,
	"eilaimemedsnaimel@gmail.com" <eilaimemedsnaimel@gmail.com>,
	"nbd@nbd.name" <nbd@nbd.name>,
	"steffen.klassert@secunet.com" <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>,
	"horms@kernel.org" <horms@kernel.org>,
	"kuba@kernel.org" <kuba@kernel.org>,
	"pabeni@redhat.com" <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	"edumazet@google.com" <edumazet@google.com>,
	"willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com"
	<willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com>,
	"willemb@google.com" <willemb@google.com>,
	"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	"matthias.bgg@gmail.com" <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
	"davem@davemloft.net" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
	<angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>,
	"sd@queasysnail.net" <sd@queasysnail.net>
Cc: "Lena Wang (王娜)" <Lena.Wang@mediatek.com>,
	"stable@vger.kernel.org" <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] net: gro: fix double aggregation of flush-marked skbs
Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2026 02:26:31 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <dd5beba874024856f4743b6ae1936a6f432333fc.camel@mediatek.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <willemdebruijn.kernel.27b4940999026@gmail.com>

On Mon, 2026-07-06 at 12:36 -0400, Willem de Bruijn wrote:
> External email : Please do not click links or open attachments until
> you have verified the sender or the content.
> 
> 
> [PATCH net v5]
> 
> Shiming Cheng wrote:
> > The skb_gro_receive_list() function is missing a critical safety
> > check
> > that exists in the skb_gro_receive() implementation. Specifically,
> > it
> > does not validate NAPI_GRO_CB(skb)->flush before allowing packet
> > aggregation
> 
> In v3 I requested referring to the commit that fixed this in
> skb_gro_receive: commit 0ab03f353d36 ("net-gro: Fix GRO flush when
> receiving a GSO packet."). That explains the issue well.

updated in PATCH V6.

> > 
> > This allows already-GRO'd packets with existing frag_list to be
> > re-aggregated into a new GRO session, corrupting the frag_list
> > chain
> > structure. When skb_segment() attempts to unpack these malformed
> > packets,
> > it encounters invalid state and triggers a kernel panic.
> > 
> > Scenario (Tethering/Device forwarding):
> >   1. Driver: Generated aggregated packet P1 via LRO with frag_list
> >   2. Dev A: Receives aggregated fraglist packet and flush flag set
> >   3. Dev A: Re-enters GRO, skb_gro_receive_list() is called
> >   4. Missing flush check allows re-aggregation despite flush flag
> >   5. Frag_list chain becomes corrupted (loops or dangling refs)
> >   6. Dev B: TX path calls skb_segment(), crashes on corrupted
> > frag_list
> > 
> > Root cause in skb_segment():
> >   The check at line ~4891:
> >     if (hsize <= 0 && i >= nfrags && skb_headlen(list_skb) &&
> >         (skb_headlen(list_skb) == len || sg)) {
> > 
> >   When frag_list is corrupted by double aggregation, when list_skb
> > is
> >   a NULL pointer from skb->next, skb_headlen(list_skb) dereference
> >   NULL/corrupted pointers occurs.
> > 
> > Call Trace:
> >  skb_headlen(NULL skb)
> >  skb_segment
> >  tcp_gso_segment
> >  tcp4_gso_segment
> >  inet_gso_segment
> >  skb_mac_gso_segment
> >  __skb_gso_segment
> >  skb_gso_segment
> >  validate_xmit_skb
> >  validate_xmit_skb_list
> >  sch_direct_xmit
> >  qdisc_restart
> >  __qdisc_run
> >  qdisc_run
> >  net_tx_action
> > 
> > Fix: Add NAPI_GRO_CB(skb)->flush validation to the early-return
> > check in
> > skb_gro_receive_list(), matching the defensive programming pattern
> > of
> > skb_gro_receive().
> > 
> > Fixes: 3a1296a38d0c ("net: Support GRO/GSO fraglist chaining.")
> > Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> > Signed-off-by: Shiming Cheng <shiming.cheng@mediatek.com>
> > ---
> >  net/core/gro.c | 9 ++++++++-
> >  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/net/core/gro.c b/net/core/gro.c
> > index 35f2f708f010..b1573d98f3a5 100644
> > --- a/net/core/gro.c
> > +++ b/net/core/gro.c
> > @@ -229,7 +229,14 @@ int skb_gro_receive(struct sk_buff *p, struct
> > sk_buff *skb)
> > 
> >  int skb_gro_receive_list(struct sk_buff *p, struct sk_buff *skb)
> >  {
> > -     if (unlikely(p->len + skb->len >= 65536))
> > +     /*
> > +      * Packets marked with NAPI_GRO_CB(skb)->flush have already
> > gone
> > +      * through GRO/LRO processing and must not be aggregated
> > again.
> > +      * Re-entering frag_list GRO may corrupt the frag_list chain
> > and
> > +      * later crash during GSO segmentaiont.
> > +      */
> 
> Such a verbose comment is not needed. Code would be overwhelmed by
> comments if done everywhere.
> 

updated comment in PATCH V6.

> > +     if (unlikely(p->len + skb->len >= 65536 ||
> > +                  NAPI_GRO_CB(skb)->flush))
> >               return -E2BIG;
> > 
> >       if (!pskb_may_pull(skb, skb_gro_offset(skb))) {
> > --
> > 2.45.2
> > 
> 
> 

      reply	other threads:[~2026-07-07  2:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-07-06  3:46 [PATCH v5] net: gro: fix double aggregation of flush-marked skbs Shiming Cheng
2026-07-06 16:36 ` Willem de Bruijn
2026-07-07  2:26   ` Shiming Cheng (成诗明) [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=dd5beba874024856f4743b6ae1936a6f432333fc.camel@mediatek.com \
    --to=shiming.cheng@mediatek.com \
    --cc=Lena.Wang@mediatek.com \
    --cc=alice@isovalent.com \
    --cc=angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com \
    --cc=daniel.zahka@gmail.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=dsahern@kernel.org \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=eilaimemedsnaimel@gmail.com \
    --cc=horms@kernel.org \
    --cc=imv4bel@gmail.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
    --cc=nbd@nbd.name \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=sd@queasysnail.net \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=steffen.klassert@secunet.com \
    --cc=willemb@google.com \
    --cc=willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox