From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 70EF3CD3445 for ; Fri, 8 May 2026 16:20:46 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:In-Reply-To:From:References:Cc:To:Subject:MIME-Version:Date: Message-ID:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From: Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=OqtuJSGDNO5ECwD5qTpWrG3+H6LLJZbAaU3D2FX/gd4=; b=gx2tHMgo0kenpxarKQLrgyedFP t22i2bbKIRD5DpPzKR4dVPt4sgQ6UqVYLjUGiuI7TvXaRgoPGjYWlzwlcomvOMqdmGDdEb8GCVlbm GEbFhUBzxjI+cYcrKjZhS4lmOkjOZz2Ti9i33/3KwLJhN0bHeZdLE2eJDlWaeGV/J3chH0P4F636z gvF1YPV3a55rVW0zEspvxn01o9cJds9VUYd+NsSY5FRWQMAywGAYf2rEKJHWc/RVX0as6cMrEIhCV JCO2hbPcVmKnfltPq0lPWHCwaAj+QMB+kweVA4hpf+rZMnygA2pJ4rfsu3pVTCiIA32KYK80QxLNN Wssn0aDg==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.99.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1wLNw0-00000006ybI-3uBX; Fri, 08 May 2026 16:20:16 +0000 Received: from mx.nabladev.com ([2a00:f820:417:0:178:251:229:89]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.99.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1wLNvy-00000006yaM-1sF4 for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 08 May 2026 16:20:15 +0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Mailerdaemon) with ESMTPSA id 6EB0A10D4EC; Fri, 8 May 2026 18:20:11 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nabladev.com; s=dkim; t=1778257212; h=from:subject:date:message-id:to:cc:mime-version:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-language:in-reply-to:references; bh=OqtuJSGDNO5ECwD5qTpWrG3+H6LLJZbAaU3D2FX/gd4=; b=hRqjGfl6+Hz5Mm1zUBPkNTPEwQEZrJdTheBJmGcHZ6NaCgyPEVTOChWdnyLYCZLq0qUR1k wyKVW7M9z5wJD9VxgnZYoKELPhLfJsprJ3b+fXsh3BkL3VzwN9FK4V6XHdqltygfmr6z2a DHtLa1oyyKWjroTJ9KYbQNN3rnGyfPecg6MFsjR0ryFfSbGSt+JRMS3rIXZ/Xoefcq9RA8 j/fB0dJU6a5YB1pBrmtJmfk6S67qvluYMOknwWqhNulPUE2TGx5XaJVMshhLaBUSQFQ/N4 gkPp2eGek9S7w5BvjDHitaNlX/6ZBjSnUq4m2wdrE1pnBw1MguAFNVrYeuM3nA== Message-ID: Date: Fri, 8 May 2026 18:20:10 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/6] arm64: dts: imx8mm: imx8mp: Add LVDS DTOs for Data Modul i.MX8M Mini and Plus eDM SBC To: Frank Li Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Conor Dooley , Fabio Estevam , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Pengutronix Kernel Team , Rob Herring , Sascha Hauer , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, imx@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20260407211850.79881-1-marex@nabladev.com> <65342735-44b3-4a2b-90ab-6093e0fd91c9@nabladev.com> Content-Language: en-US From: Marek Vasut In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Last-TLS-Session-Version: TLSv1.3 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.9.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20260508_092014_649526_887F257A X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 10.81 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On 5/8/26 5:46 PM, Frank Li wrote: Hello Frank, >> this patchset is now split. How can we proceed ? > > I am thinking about it. I found an old thread > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-devicetree/20250902105710.00512c6d@booty/ > > The current code base already supportted partitial of it, such as gpio and > irq map for connector. > > Internal chancel liu have prepared version by use nexus mapping for audio > boards, which almost done to send out to review. > > I want to wait for a little bit well to resolve or partitial resolve N x M > problem. DT connectors have been discussed for the last 10 or so years and three is still no real progress. I would be happy to send a follow up patchset which would convert the DTOs to whatever connector implementation format lands in the future, but I am concerned that waiting for DT connectors will block this patchset from landing for a long time. So how about finalizing this patchset, landing it, and once connectors become available, I will send a follow up conversion patchset ? Would that be workable for you ?