From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 04B8FCD3447 for ; Sat, 9 May 2026 02:25:13 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:In-Reply-To:From:References:Cc:To:Subject:MIME-Version:Date: Message-ID:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From: Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=Es6Vws/eOKlp6GKSxTpWgYQiUx72bXIcoH8A5zQmI8s=; b=eRy8gb0WkZl5DdX3z4SjeEPrav V1aRxXd/2+X0x9jgoOOvCTsGxxxEAgLODZb+vm75YPiNRX6MUCb6481ZkK++dAwZXsu4qnPzNhL2v FiAER5YXcy/Y08k9/EOcv1DXEHFZTMUfZMOkl3iGowNGpmLI2mGEbcNC0Ktxx2Wg0gDmTYRVa9bpl MiU9slinKVgWk0Th4w3fApV2QVvK+qT2I2Vp+fjTxPkDuyNxPZlifrQ0C1f+PCPIsVzUdAtgEFHRE vrmZVfI7kp6uMlv0/uhyJQ5Yi1XJYs+n8kUggCssYVTuEfBuQScDP9SEKorsENE0URK5hpebLE+2D SzgeP+Uw==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.99.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1wLXNK-000000080TB-3fja; Sat, 09 May 2026 02:25:06 +0000 Received: from mx.nabladev.com ([178.251.229.89]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.99.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1wLXNI-000000080SO-3MMS for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Sat, 09 May 2026 02:25:06 +0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Mailerdaemon) with ESMTPSA id 943A3113FEF; Sat, 9 May 2026 04:24:59 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nabladev.com; s=dkim; t=1778293502; h=from:subject:date:message-id:to:cc:mime-version:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-language:in-reply-to:references; bh=Es6Vws/eOKlp6GKSxTpWgYQiUx72bXIcoH8A5zQmI8s=; b=XA0zSWNGfIxfsU8SO9vPVaT8aQl+J5o0UthVWlclapZjE/zgJ7/eZJCXPN2uwMa9juvK8B m9Mi86M8qs7rcfw1wDbLqqGfDiHOuCPjFch5xeWBroP0yeZzFOnt7y0AjBTF2uuAZeNtSM VNhQs1KBv7APWyl4yYTRwFZjiLkjG7BRM+5WHqKJQef/KPWLOxReqyjcQ/3ELrvR9hFSSF 7Y6URWipGU+NTPHQ7xA7VyH4/Bta28WropyrSB0am8ENasGLcJk8KN9G1fSlyA0QB1mJHz 3r70vA694+HII200i+TmUiEApOfhWDXcQ5fxPtrlUhRJv/kjWxoLxTAlR1xXkw== Message-ID: Date: Fri, 8 May 2026 23:47:48 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/6] arm64: dts: imx8mm: imx8mp: Add LVDS DTOs for Data Modul i.MX8M Mini and Plus eDM SBC To: Frank Li Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Conor Dooley , Fabio Estevam , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Pengutronix Kernel Team , Rob Herring , Sascha Hauer , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, imx@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20260407211850.79881-1-marex@nabladev.com> <65342735-44b3-4a2b-90ab-6093e0fd91c9@nabladev.com> Content-Language: en-US From: Marek Vasut In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Last-TLS-Session-Version: TLSv1.3 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.9.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20260508_192505_079979_4B06CD4C X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 14.67 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On 5/8/26 10:15 PM, Frank Li wrote: > On Fri, May 08, 2026 at 06:20:10PM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote: >> On 5/8/26 5:46 PM, Frank Li wrote: >> >> Hello Frank, >> >>>> this patchset is now split. How can we proceed ? >>> >>> I am thinking about it. I found an old thread >>> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-devicetree/20250902105710.00512c6d@booty/ >>> >>> The current code base already supportted partitial of it, such as gpio and >>> irq map for connector. >>> >>> Internal chancel liu have prepared version by use nexus mapping for audio >>> boards, which almost done to send out to review. >>> >>> I want to wait for a little bit well to resolve or partitial resolve N x M >>> problem. >> DT connectors have been discussed for the last 10 or so years and three is >> still no real progress. >> >> I would be happy to send a follow up patchset which would convert the DTOs >> to whatever connector implementation format lands in the future, but I am >> concerned that waiting for DT connectors will block this patchset from >> landing for a long time. >> >> So how about finalizing this patchset, landing it, and once connectors >> become available, I will send a follow up conversion patchset ? Would that >> be workable for you ? > > We still have times, can you wait for chancel liu's patch for a while to > check if his method can help this situation. Do you know when chancel liu's patch is going to be submitted ? Is there maybe some preliminary version I can try ? Thank you for your help !