From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: psodagud@codeaurora.org (Sodagudi Prasad) Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2017 21:52:30 -0800 Subject: Looking more details and reasons for using orig_add_limit. Message-ID: To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Hi All, Would like to understand the reasons behind using the orig_add_limit variable in the following code. Can you please share more details ? "arch/arm64/mm/fault.c" static int __kprobes do_page_fault(unsigned long addr, unsigned int esr, struct pt_regs *regs) { ? ? ? if (addr < USER_DS && is_permission_fault(esr, regs)) { =====>> condition_1 /* regs->orig_addr_limit may be 0 if we entered from EL0 */ if (regs->orig_addr_limit == KERNEL_DS) =====>> condition_2 die("Accessing user space memory with fs=KERNEL_DS", regs, esr); if (is_el1_instruction_abort(esr)) die("Attempting to execute userspace memory", regs, esr); if (!search_exception_tables(regs->pc)) die("Accessing user space memory outside uaccess.h routines", regs, esr); } When any sys call is made from user space orig_addr_limit will be zero and after that driver is calling set_fs(KERNEL_DS) and then copy_to_user() to user space memory. If there is permission fault for user space address the above condition is leading to kernel crash. Because orig_add_limit is having KERNEL_DS as set_fs called before copy_to_user(). 1) So I would like to understand that, is that user space pointer leading to permission fault not correct(condition_1) in this scenario? 2) Are there any corner cases where these if conditions (condition_1 and condition2) would lead to kernel crash ? 3) What are all scenarios these if conditions (condition_1 and condition2) would like to take care? -Thanks, Prasad -- The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, Linux Foundation Collaborative Project