From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: jan.kiszka@siemens.com (Jan Kiszka) Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2017 16:29:28 +0100 Subject: [PATCH v3 2/3] spi: pxa2xx: Prepare for edge-triggered interrupts In-Reply-To: <20170120122129.6cn5phrobeldpikp@sirena.org.uk> References: <7b15a0910a3ad861fd32161c72559bafa7b71e29.1484592296.git.jan.kiszka@siemens.com> <87ziiqdstr.fsf@belgarion.home> <4d97e416-4d32-3b9f-0695-de116a4b26bd@siemens.com> <87r340eq28.fsf@belgarion.home> <20170118124645.6ugjwbfeq5vsh2to@sirena.org.uk> <7e5fb21d-35bd-6ac3-9e6f-cffed656997f@siemens.com> <20170119195701.kueutgmahr6bmxhq@sirena.org.uk> <1484856272.2133.253.camel@linux.intel.com> <20170120122129.6cn5phrobeldpikp@sirena.org.uk> Message-ID: To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 2017-01-20 13:21, Mark Brown wrote: > On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 10:04:32PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: >> On Thu, 2017-01-19 at 19:57 +0000, Mark Brown wrote: > >>> I'm missing patches 1 and 3, what's going on here? > >> Patch 1 had been applied by you. I think Jan just needs to resend with >> proper version and set of patches. > > OK - Jan, the purpose of numbering patches in a series is so we can tell > what order they come in. That's it. If the set of patches gets changed > due to things being added or removed the numbers will be different but > that's totally OK as their only relevance is in ordering things within a > given posting. Sorry if the numbering was confusing for you, it was, of course, a selective update. Just tell me, if you need a new round with of patches 2 and 3 (as 1 and 2). Jan -- Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT RDA ITP SES-DE Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 181 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: