From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 18B4AC4332F for ; Fri, 25 Nov 2022 14:58:14 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:From:References:Cc:To: Subject:MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=zPW3e+QiWlukv2yinVqWvDS2RIhL1KpKx29gLzv6x6A=; b=gMlG5izSIzg96F iBRsNvBQatxUecJj65DqfreGgjZagQ2zmgLBh1/J7Vx1JYHaYdg4UVeDoW0eVIRUqW1Lea2m8pum1 YoOxup50ovq3faf7Lu4C5Pe8cjw4T0ezZd8UhrgvaFyMI8IT1VuUXtg0l0zgvjUedFsVCqbJfD43l gYPaEbYubkhEX6AFcns3qzTf5QuFiXoXczwFLznZF27ATTu/jW/+bNMoGQG0UOh891IJ1uyVLOJWl 9dwhdNSWqEDocSPFbcG8V9PZ4MpGpH8uPDHxJdwT8434Kk07pp7OwpiAPhrgd6xZTPtehxiR+sONq KYb/HM3gA9o9pLUYKDdA==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1oya8P-00HFq8-EK; Fri, 25 Nov 2022 14:56:58 +0000 Received: from mail-lf1-x12e.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::12e]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1oyZz8-00HBA8-F5 for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 25 Nov 2022 14:47:23 +0000 Received: by mail-lf1-x12e.google.com with SMTP id p8so7207811lfu.11 for ; Fri, 25 Nov 2022 06:47:22 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:content-language :references:cc:to:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=osoEBytHjlQAPUyZve5rkRqahTmWVeqKGttLOtMjR3Y=; b=usClvSs3mC6FvIhfguF/sEt/gkxumcuZsEzXV26BLwCRWyr07wpUDcacmF61zVLKPR 4b46+DrsjeGTpJs4Rz6cKLkXOJNviO0ZeBoqcGZGt6PWmxFN+kR+a96LaG8VwLpSqDkx goU+yxqpDJ/wWC5qZvAINZkaHs5Yqu6Dyn/gkN36gYSpsynBgMP78DiVuICmU5IoYSDu ZSN5X5Za9PqaptEEca8OmXdQ9gvV5B+AF+roHy6kclTYwEc+dAsg6/RiBrprc8VtRRtb ue6EdI+9kSpsFmIkikRBiN+RbXp81fj4XYloUMa16gJjB+8ssQrKA0NK0EVWlEfJjx5e wKrg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:content-language :references:cc:to:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=osoEBytHjlQAPUyZve5rkRqahTmWVeqKGttLOtMjR3Y=; b=SQsQw9ucN25y/JmrMFRXuzbE9dsTYjMbSm9YgzFPj/DRpM03173TBsRb9SQbUtUs1x 2E3Dcs5N+Q4GDfFHP7OaRaE3pKvnsStAxxpbiQZ2WxtNbJYgM0rzVSab/g3bO2Uvhv+c mv0Ru+ZRWZTmHq+WUVvViPVgwOyyos02q46Qxjwlvx0niSP1cM9Is5KH1m6xGhTK92v1 p9VNBBT03ubgIsQ5AIGl9FYVQdLzvgKQrGMQsFRdRpmAFSVzVbSELkY1Qu7wwSJoBeus FsA5NtH/m1b/YPvQfmKi7CzwZN6Wa3juJeqlyZ4SVWrt54Cg2tpG4tpNoYfu3yftD8kz lEMw== X-Gm-Message-State: ANoB5pk3zLO/ZrYizws5Th+uJKbyTENjopKAFSQsiuNllDZWLMvcmVSq vxgJ9USiKa/fW5cjHc0gCbfjsmUW/Kbs8yVi X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA0mqf4JdsPg2OacWHAZHBS95kHhrvSJgsXU9oA5FBTdtRat1RDp/3S8jHWNMMuKkVsrI0TT4mXz8A== X-Received: by 2002:ac2:4843:0:b0:4a2:1169:3934 with SMTP id 3-20020ac24843000000b004a211693934mr13530237lfy.279.1669387640881; Fri, 25 Nov 2022 06:47:20 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.0.20] (088156142067.dynamic-2-waw-k-3-2-0.vectranet.pl. [88.156.142.67]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id w10-20020a05651234ca00b00494942bec60sm557057lfr.17.2022.11.25.06.47.19 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 25 Nov 2022 06:47:20 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2022 15:47:19 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.5.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] dt-bindings: soc: samsung: exynos-sysreg: add dedicated SYSREG compatibles to Exynos5433 To: Sam Protsenko Cc: Lee Jones , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Alim Akhtar , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, Sriranjani P , Chanho Park References: <20221125112201.240178-1-krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org> <20221125112201.240178-3-krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org> Content-Language: en-US From: Krzysztof Kozlowski In-Reply-To: X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20221125_064722_558902_7B9718B1 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 12.29 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On 25/11/2022 15:22, Sam Protsenko wrote: > On Fri, 25 Nov 2022 at 05:22, Krzysztof Kozlowski > wrote: >> >> Exynos5433 has several different SYSREGs, so use dedicated compatibles >> for them. >> >> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski >> >> --- >> >> Cc: Sriranjani P >> Cc: Chanho Park >> Cc: Sam Protsenko >> --- > > Hi Krzysztof, > > Just curious: what is the rationale for adding those more specific > sysregs? AFAIR, e.g. in Exynos850, different SysReg instances have > pretty much the same register layout. > On Exynos5433 all these blocks have different registers. Are you saying that Exynos850 has four (or more) sysregs which are exactly the same? Same registers? Why would they duplicate it? Best regards, Krzysztof _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel