From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.7 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_PASS autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 292D8C04EB9 for ; Tue, 4 Dec 2018 02:10:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DCC2B2087F for ; Tue, 4 Dec 2018 02:10:18 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="VQbIVxRq" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org DCC2B2087F Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=amlogic.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=Sender:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:From: References:To:Subject:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=Id4wkJQIFClz+w21QYPGrGeq/Sm+LYDPB7uJXltGsIo=; b=VQbIVxRq+GJ+zHCjt95MYPoYp RQlFeoMCGZ71wQd3Ng8LrBToAeLwk8XWawgePq2VAqaF6I7E4foLGHeMse6DNEHP/VTOqBaNhDvTA qWIH+R6ziLVm5wdyvXUhORbFVIU48coTM7GS5/l/NY4kXfjKC8yaM9xjt28T/c5UNfSEG2Hek/xWw Ltm7vFiiLasRD0wZjrMB/1cXwD/0KJJdBCN9YTDMBaxG8E0RraWQ3+h82O9xWZNXDr/coaYPpoMbi eOxt1IZ3zMAIc81ucB8rkbsaUOiXWCEhWqiRgGboZVunlHmDbzy5FAF61Ea1bohioWfD2jLQ/lzVO 3zQ8wba/g==; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1gU0AC-0005S7-NM; Tue, 04 Dec 2018 02:10:16 +0000 Received: from mail-sz2.amlogic.com ([211.162.65.114]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.90_1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1gU0A8-00049d-R1; Tue, 04 Dec 2018 02:10:14 +0000 Received: from [10.28.18.81] (10.28.18.81) by mail-sz2.amlogic.com (10.28.11.6) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1320.4; Tue, 4 Dec 2018 10:10:22 +0800 Subject: Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: meson: fix G12A ao pull registers base address To: Jerome Brunet , Neil Armstrong , , References: <20181203030533.10989-1-xingyu.chen@amlogic.com> From: Xingyu Chen Message-ID: Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2018 10:10:22 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.3.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Language: en-GB X-Originating-IP: [10.28.18.81] X-ClientProxiedBy: mail-sz2.amlogic.com (10.28.11.6) To mail-sz2.amlogic.com (10.28.11.6) X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20181203_181012_879807_26A085C4 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 20.56 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: robh@kernel.org, jianxin.pan@amlogic.com, martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com, khilman@baylibre.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Xingyu Chen , carlo@caione.org, linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On 2018/12/3 18:36, Jerome Brunet wrote: > On Mon, 2018-12-03 at 11:27 +0100, Neil Armstrong wrote: >> Hi Xingyu, >> >> >> On 03/12/2018 04:05, Xingyu Chen wrote: >>> Since Meson G12A SoC, Introduce new ao registers AO_RTI_PULL_UP_EN_REG >>> and AO_GPIO_O. >>> >>> These bits of controlling output level are remapped to the new register >>> AO_GPIO_O, and the AO_GPIO_O_EN_N support only controlling output enable. >>> >>> These bits of controlling pull enable are remapped to the new register >>> AO_RTI_PULL_UP_EN_REG, and the AO_RTI_PULL_UP_REG support only controlling >>> pull type(up/down). >>> >>> The new layout of ao gpio/pull registers is as follows: >>> - AO_GPIO_O_EN_N [offset: 0x9 << 2] >>> - AO_GPIO_I [offset: 0xa << 2] >>> - AO_RTI_PULL_UP_REG [offset: 0xb << 2] >>> - AO_RTI_PULL_UP_EN_REG [offset: 0xc << 2] >>> - AO_GPIO_O [offset: 0xd << 2] >>> >>> From above, we can see ao GPIO registers region has been separated by the >>> ao pull registers. In order to ensure the continuity of the region on >>> software, the ao GPIO and ao pull registers use the same base address, but >>> can be identified by the offset. >>> >>> Fixes: 29ae0952e85f ("pinctrl: meson-g12a: add pinctrl driver support") >>> Signed-off-by: Xingyu Chen >>> Signed-off-by: Jianxin Pan >>> --- >>> drivers/pinctrl/meson/pinctrl-meson.c | 22 ++++++++++++---------- >>> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) >>> >>> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/meson/pinctrl-meson.c >>> b/drivers/pinctrl/meson/pinctrl-meson.c >>> index 53d449076dee..7ff40cd7a0cb 100644 >>> --- a/drivers/pinctrl/meson/pinctrl-meson.c >>> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/meson/pinctrl-meson.c >>> @@ -31,6 +31,9 @@ >>> * In some cases the register ranges for pull enable and pull >>> * direction are the same and thus there are only 3 register ranges. >>> * >>> + * Since Meson G12A SoC, the ao register ranges for gpio, pull enable >>> + * and pull direction are the same, so there are only 2 register ranges. >>> + * >>> * For the pull and GPIO configuration every bank uses a contiguous >>> * set of bits in the register sets described above; the same register >>> * can be shared by more banks with different offsets. >>> @@ -487,23 +490,22 @@ static int meson_pinctrl_parse_dt(struct >>> meson_pinctrl *pc, >>> return PTR_ERR(pc->reg_mux); >>> } >>> >>> - pc->reg_pull = meson_map_resource(pc, gpio_np, "pull"); >>> - if (IS_ERR(pc->reg_pull)) { >>> - dev_err(pc->dev, "pull registers not found\n"); >>> - return PTR_ERR(pc->reg_pull); >>> + pc->reg_gpio = meson_map_resource(pc, gpio_np, "gpio"); >>> + if (IS_ERR(pc->reg_gpio)) { >>> + dev_err(pc->dev, "gpio registers not found\n"); >>> + return PTR_ERR(pc->reg_gpio); >>> } >>> >>> + pc->reg_pull = meson_map_resource(pc, gpio_np, "pull"); >>> + /* Use gpio region if pull one is not present */ >>> + if (IS_ERR(pc->reg_pull)) >>> + pc->reg_pull = pc->reg_gpio; >>> + >>> pc->reg_pullen = meson_map_resource(pc, gpio_np, "pull-enable"); >>> /* Use pull region if pull-enable one is not present */ >>> if (IS_ERR(pc->reg_pullen)) >>> pc->reg_pullen = pc->reg_pull; >>> >>> - pc->reg_gpio = meson_map_resource(pc, gpio_np, "gpio"); >>> - if (IS_ERR(pc->reg_gpio)) { >>> - dev_err(pc->dev, "gpio registers not found\n"); >>> - return PTR_ERR(pc->reg_gpio); >>> - } >>> - >>> return 0; >>> } >>> >>> >> Doesn't it need an update of the bindings ? > > Going even further, shouldn't we stop trying make multiple regions out of > this, and have just one ? > > On all the Amlogic SoC we have seen so far, all the regions a very (VERY) > close to each other. It seems very unlikely that there something unrelated to > GPIO in between. > > It looks like everything is mostly there in the driver to deal with offset, so > change would be minimal. > > Of course, for DT stability we will need to carry the legacy, but for newer > SoC, such as the g12, does it really makes sense to have multiple regions ? > Hi, Jerome the ee gpio, pull and pull-en register regions are discontinuous, some addresses are reserved between them and maybe used for other module. For example [G12A]: range of gpio register address offset: (0x010 << 2) - (0x022 << 2) range of pull register address offset: (0x03a << 2) - (0x03f << 2) range of pull-en register address offset: (0x048 << 2) - (0x04d << 2) keeping the multiple register regions seems to be more flexible and friendly for Meson Series SoCs at present. >> >> Neil >> > > > . > _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel