From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: f.fainelli@gmail.com (Florian Fainelli) Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2017 14:30:50 -0800 Subject: [PATCHv6 00/11] CONFIG_DEBUG_VIRTUAL for arm64 In-Reply-To: <20170104114449.GA18193@arm.com> References: <1483464113-1587-1-git-send-email-labbott@redhat.com> <20170104114449.GA18193@arm.com> Message-ID: To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 01/04/2017 03:44 AM, Will Deacon wrote: > On Tue, Jan 03, 2017 at 03:25:53PM -0800, Laura Abbott wrote: >> On 01/03/2017 02:56 PM, Florian Fainelli wrote: >>> On 01/03/2017 09:21 AM, Laura Abbott wrote: >>>> Happy New Year! >>>> >>>> This is a very minor rebase from v5. It only moves a few headers around. >>>> I think this series should be ready to be queued up for 4.11. >>> >>> FWIW: >>> >>> Tested-by: Florian Fainelli >>> >> >> Thanks! >> >>> How do we get this series included? I would like to get the ARM 32-bit >>> counterpart included as well (will resubmit rebased shortly), but I have >>> no clue which tree this should be going through. >>> >> >> I was assuming this would go through the arm64 tree unless Catalin/Will >> have an objection to that. > > Yup, I was planning to pick it up for 4.11. > > Florian -- does your series depend on this? If so, then I'll need to > co-ordinate with Russell (probably via a shared branch that we both pull) > if you're aiming for 4.11 too. Yes, pretty much everything in Laura's patch series is relevant, except the arm64 bits. I will get v6 out now addressing Laura's and Hartley's feedback and then, if you could holler when and where you have applied these, I can coordinate with Russell about how to get these included. Thanks and happy new year! -- Florian