public inbox for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Arnaud POULIQUEN <arnaud.pouliquen@foss.st.com>
To: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>, <andersson@kernel.org>
Cc: <shawnguo@kernel.org>, <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>,
	<kernel@pengutronix.de>, <festevam@gmail.com>,
	<linux-imx@nxp.com>, <patrice.chotard@foss.st.com>,
	<mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com>, <alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com>,
	<arnaud.pouliquen@st.com>, <hongxing.zhu@nxp.com>,
	<peng.fan@nxp.com>, <shengjiu.wang@nxp.com>,
	<linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] remoteproc: stm32: Call of_node_put() on iteration error
Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2023 10:00:03 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <e3644e19-7453-440b-00dc-781104ca83cf@foss.st.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230320221826.2728078-2-mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>

Hi Mathieu,

On 3/20/23 23:18, Mathieu Poirier wrote:
> Function of_phandle_iterator_next() calls of_node_put() on the last
> device_node it iterated over, but when the loop exits prematurely it has
> to be called explicitly> 
> Fixes: 13140de09cc2 ("remoteproc: stm32: add an ST stm32_rproc driver")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
> ---
>  drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c | 6 +++++-
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c b/drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c
> index 7d782ed9e589..23c1690b8d73 100644
> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c
> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c
> @@ -223,11 +223,13 @@ static int stm32_rproc_prepare(struct rproc *rproc)
>  	while (of_phandle_iterator_next(&it) == 0) {
>  		rmem = of_reserved_mem_lookup(it.node);
>  		if (!rmem) {
> +			of_node_put(it.node);
>  			dev_err(dev, "unable to acquire memory-region\n");
>  			return -EINVAL;
>  		}
>  
>  		if (stm32_rproc_pa_to_da(rproc, rmem->base, &da) < 0) {
> +			of_node_put(it.node);
>  			dev_err(dev, "memory region not valid %pa\n",
>  				&rmem->base);
>  			return -EINVAL;
> @@ -254,8 +256,10 @@ static int stm32_rproc_prepare(struct rproc *rproc)
>  							   it.node->name);
>  		}
>  
> -		if (!mem)
> +		if (!mem) {
> +			of_node_put(it.node);
>  			return -ENOMEM;
> +		}

Good catch!

Looking in code I don't see that we call of_node_put() when we release the
carveouts. 
Please tell me if I'm wrong but look to me that we should also call of_node_put()
in mem->release() op, in drivers. 

This one remains valid.
reviewed-by: Arnaud Pouliquen <arnaud.pouliquen@foss.st.com>

Thanks,
Arnaud


>  
>  		rproc_add_carveout(rproc, mem);
>  		index++;

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2023-03-21  9:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-03-20 22:18 [PATCH 0/5] remoteproc: Call of_node_put() on iteration error Mathieu Poirier
2023-03-20 22:18 ` [PATCH 1/5] remoteproc: stm32: " Mathieu Poirier
2023-03-21  9:00   ` Arnaud POULIQUEN [this message]
2023-03-21 21:32     ` Mathieu Poirier
2023-03-22  8:21       ` Arnaud POULIQUEN
2023-03-20 22:18 ` [PATCH 2/5] remoteproc: st: " Mathieu Poirier
2023-03-21  9:01   ` Arnaud POULIQUEN
2023-03-20 22:18 ` [PATCH 3/5] remoteproc: rcar_rproc: " Mathieu Poirier
2023-03-20 22:18 ` [PATCH 4/5] remoteproc: imx_rproc: " Mathieu Poirier
2023-03-21  3:00   ` Peng Fan
2023-03-20 22:18 ` [PATCH 5/5] retmoteproc: imx_dsp_rproc: " Mathieu Poirier
2023-03-20 23:02   ` Fabio Estevam
2023-03-21 21:19     ` Mathieu Poirier
2023-03-21  3:34   ` S.J. Wang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=e3644e19-7453-440b-00dc-781104ca83cf@foss.st.com \
    --to=arnaud.pouliquen@foss.st.com \
    --cc=alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com \
    --cc=andersson@kernel.org \
    --cc=arnaud.pouliquen@st.com \
    --cc=festevam@gmail.com \
    --cc=hongxing.zhu@nxp.com \
    --cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-imx@nxp.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mathieu.poirier@linaro.org \
    --cc=mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com \
    --cc=patrice.chotard@foss.st.com \
    --cc=peng.fan@nxp.com \
    --cc=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=shawnguo@kernel.org \
    --cc=shengjiu.wang@nxp.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox