From: marek.vasut@gmail.com (Marek Vasut)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v3 5/5] mtd: spi-nor: cadence-quadspi: Add runtime PM support
Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2017 15:51:55 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <e4ad5d80-9093-b667-f0a5-d3105be4e8cf@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <038919d3-ff32-d0a7-4c0a-3be16436052d@ti.com>
On 09/24/2017 03:27 PM, Vignesh R wrote:
>
>
> On 9/24/2017 6:42 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
>> On 09/24/2017 03:08 PM, Vignesh R wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 9/24/2017 5:31 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
>>>> On 09/24/2017 12:59 PM, Vignesh R wrote:
>>>>> Add pm_runtime* calls to cadence-quadspi driver. This is required to
>>>>> switch on QSPI power domain on TI 66AK2G SoC during probe.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Vignesh R <vigneshr@ti.com>
>>>>
>>>> Are you planning to add some more fine-grained PM control later?
>>>
>>> Yes, I will need to add fine-grained PM control at some point. But, for
>>> now SoC does not really support low power mode or runtime power saving
>>> option.
>>> The fact that driver still uses clk_prepare_*() calls to enable/disable
>>> clocks instead of pm_*() calls makes it a bit tricky though.
>>>
>>> Just figured out I forgot to add cleanup code in error handling path of
>>> probe(). Will fix that and send a v4.
>>
>> OK, fine. Cleanups are welcome. The SoCFPGA doesn't do much runtime PM
>> either, so it's fine for now.
>>
>
> Ok thanks! Do you know if pm_runtime_get_sync() can enable clocks for
> QSPI on SoCFPGA or if clk_prepare_enable() is needed? Just trying to see
> if its possible to get rid of clk_*() calls in favor of pm_*() calls.
Not of the top of my head, sorry. +CC Matthew, he should know.
--
Best regards,
Marek Vasut
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-09-24 13:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-09-24 10:59 [PATCH v3 0/5] K2G: Add QSPI support Vignesh R
2017-09-24 10:59 ` [PATCH v3 1/5] mtd: spi-nor: cadence-quadspi: Add TI 66AK2G SoC specific compatible Vignesh R
2017-09-24 10:59 ` [PATCH v3 2/5] mtd: spi-nor: cadence-quadspi: add a delay in write sequence Vignesh R
2017-09-24 11:59 ` Marek Vasut
2017-09-24 12:33 ` Vignesh R
2017-09-24 13:13 ` Marek Vasut
2017-10-02 12:46 ` Vignesh R
2017-09-24 10:59 ` [PATCH v3 3/5] mtd: spi-nor: cadence-quadspi: Add new binding to enable loop-back circuit Vignesh R
2017-09-24 10:59 ` [PATCH v3 4/5] mtd: spi-nor: cadence-quadspi: Add support to enable loop-back clock circuit Vignesh R
2017-09-24 10:59 ` [PATCH v3 5/5] mtd: spi-nor: cadence-quadspi: Add runtime PM support Vignesh R
2017-09-24 12:01 ` Marek Vasut
2017-09-24 13:08 ` Vignesh R
2017-09-24 13:12 ` Marek Vasut
2017-09-24 13:27 ` Vignesh R
2017-09-24 13:51 ` Marek Vasut [this message]
2017-09-25 22:41 ` matthew.gerlach at linux.intel.com
2017-09-25 23:49 ` Marek Vasut
2017-09-27 10:48 ` Vignesh R
2017-09-28 15:01 ` matthew.gerlach at linux.intel.com
2017-10-02 12:28 ` Vignesh R
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=e4ad5d80-9093-b667-f0a5-d3105be4e8cf@gmail.com \
--to=marek.vasut@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).