Re: [PATCH 1/2] drm/mediatek/hdmi: Use syscon_regmap_lookup_by_phandle_args

[Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>]

On 13/01/2025 14:58, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote:
> Il 13/01/25 14:05, Krzysztof Kozlowski ha scritto:
>> On 13/01/2025 13:41, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote:
>>> Il 12/01/25 14:47, Krzysztof Kozlowski ha scritto:
>>>> Use syscon_regmap_lookup_by_phandle_args() which is a wrapper over
>>>> syscon_regmap_lookup_by_phandle() combined with getting the syscon
>>>> argument.  Except simpler code this annotates within one line that given
>>>> phandle has arguments, so grepping for code would be easier.
>>>>
>>>> There is also no real benefit in printing errors on missing syscon
>>>> argument, because this is done just too late: runtime check on
>>>> static/build-time data.  Dtschema and Devicetree bindings offer the
>>>> static/build-time check for this already.
>>>>
>>>
>>> I agree with this change but can you please rebase it over [1]?
>>>
>>> The same code got migrated to mtk_hdmi_common.c instead :-)
>>>
>>> [1]:
>>> https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250108112744.64686-1-angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com
>> My is 2-patch cleanup, your is 34 patch rework and new features with
>> existing build reports, so rebase is not reasonable. It would make this
>> 2-patch cleanup wait for many cycles.
>>
> If adding the `#include <linux/bitfield.h>` line to a file would take
> *many cycles*, that'd be a bit weird, wouldn't it? :-)
It's not about include, it is about rebase. If I rebase on 34-patchset,
that's my dependency and this work cannot be merged before yours is.

And yours already have kbuild reports, so there will be v5, maybe v6 etc.

Best regards,
Krzysztof