linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
To: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] arm64: Change the cpuinfo_arm64 member type for some sysregs to u64
Date: Wed, 12 May 2021 14:54:12 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <e6863396-e525-bf17-ea0a-a6bf59e229df@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210511182322.3830-2-catalin.marinas@arm.com>

On 11/05/2021 19:23, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> The architecture has been updated and the CTR_EL0, CNTFRQ_EL1,
> DCZID_EL0, MIDR_EL1, REVIDR_EL1 registers are all 64-bit, even if most
> of them have a RES0 top 32-bit.
> 
> Change their type to u64 in struct cpuinfo_arm64.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
> Cc: Suzuki K Poulose <Suzuki.Poulose@arm.com>
> ---
> 
> CTR_EL0 gained a new field with MTE in the top 32-bit, TminLine. I have
> no idea what software is supposed to do with this field. I even have a
> Jira ticket from 2019 asking for it to be removed. So I don't think we
> should bother adding the mask/checks for it to the kernel.
> 
>   arch/arm64/include/asm/cpu.h | 10 +++++-----
>   arch/arm64/kernel/cpuinfo.c  |  2 +-
>   2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 

Reviewed-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-05-12 13:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-05-11 18:23 [PATCH 0/2] arm64: Taint the kernel on different GMID_EL1.BS Catalin Marinas
2021-05-11 18:23 ` [PATCH 1/2] arm64: Change the cpuinfo_arm64 member type for some sysregs to u64 Catalin Marinas
2021-05-12 13:29   ` Mark Rutland
2021-05-12 13:54   ` Suzuki K Poulose [this message]
2021-05-24  1:31   ` Shaokun Zhang
2021-05-26 16:07     ` Catalin Marinas
2021-05-11 18:23 ` [PATCH 2/2] arm64: Check if GMID_EL1.BS is the same on all CPUs Catalin Marinas
2021-05-12 13:33   ` Mark Rutland
2021-05-26 19:47   ` Jon Hunter
2021-05-26 21:08     ` Will Deacon
2021-05-26 21:48     ` Catalin Marinas
2021-05-26 22:11       ` Jon Hunter
2021-05-25 18:58 ` [PATCH 0/2] arm64: Taint the kernel on different GMID_EL1.BS Will Deacon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=e6863396-e525-bf17-ea0a-a6bf59e229df@arm.com \
    --to=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).