From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: mcuos.com@gmail.com (Wan ZongShun) Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 22:25:51 +0800 Subject: My first patch to the mailist, but being held In-Reply-To: <1251814118.16594.292.camel@macbook.infradead.org> References: <1251814118.16594.292.camel@macbook.infradead.org> Message-ID: To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Dear David, 2009/9/1 David Woodhouse : > On Tue, 2009-09-01 at 22:05 +0800, Wan ZongShun wrote: >> >> Yes, I think so too, due to I never meet this type 'held' in LAKML and >> LKML, so I am amazed at this 'held' in the list. > > Not all of the mailman settings were imported from the old list to the > new one. If the moderators want to increase the size limit, they are > free to do that -- the hardware can certainly cope. > > But Eric is right that patches above 40KiB are fairly suspect anyway -- > why is it so large? The patch is one of the series patches of changing my w90x900 platform architecture, originally, I submitted nine patches to mend my platform, Russell has reviewed them and hoped me to re-arrange the patches, so I Integrated the nine patches into three ones. I just ignore the size of patch issue. > -- > dwmw2 > > -- Wan z.s