From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: mcuos.com@gmail.com (Wan ZongShun) Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 22:44:29 +0800 Subject: My first patch to the mailist, but being held In-Reply-To: References: <1251814118.16594.292.camel@macbook.infradead.org> Message-ID: To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Dear Eric, 2009/9/1 Eric Miao : > On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 10:25 PM, Wan ZongShun wrote: >> Dear David, >> >> 2009/9/1 David Woodhouse : >>> On Tue, 2009-09-01 at 22:05 +0800, Wan ZongShun wrote: >>>> >>>> Yes, I think so too, due to I never meet this type 'held' in LAKML and >>>> LKML, so I am amazed at this 'held' in the list. >>> >>> Not all of the mailman settings were imported from the old list to the >>> new one. If the moderators want to increase the size limit, they are >>> free to do that -- the hardware can certainly cope. >>> >>> But Eric is right that patches above 40KiB are fairly suspect anyway -- >>> why is it so large? >> >> The patch is one of the series patches of changing my w90x900 platform >> architecture, originally, I submitted nine patches to mend my >> platform, Russell has reviewed them and >> hoped me to re-arrange the patches, so I Integrated the nine patches >> into three ones. >> >> I just ignore the size of patch issue. >> > > You can try 'git format-patch -M' to shrink the size of the patch significantly > if renaming is involved. > I have done this, thanks. -- Wan z.s