From: psodagud@codeaurora.org (Sodagudi Prasad)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Using __always_inline attribute
Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2017 17:50:26 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <e77e6745b60629315b1b4f0e4fddd4bf@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9198053a46999b0b46dcab992527d0d7@codeaurora.org>
On 2017-06-14 15:33, Sodagudi Prasad wrote:
> On 2017-06-14 03:06, Will Deacon wrote:
>> Hi Prasad,
>>
>> On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 03:39:37PM -0700, Sodagudi Prasad wrote:
>>> With a variant of a CLANG(based on 4.0) following errors observed on
>>> Linux
>>> 4.12-rc5 tag.
>>
>> How are you building the kernel with clang, btw? I'd be keen to try
>> the same
>> thing, but I thought the LLVMLinux project was largely dead at his
>> point. Do
>> you still need build system patches, or is this now integrated with
>> Kbuild?
> Hi Will,
> Trying clang patches from below tree -
> https://android.googlesource.com/kernel/common/+/experimental/android-4.4-llvm
>
>>
>>> net/built-in.o: In function `__xchg_mb':
>>> arch/arm64/include/asm/cmpxchg.h:99: \
>>> undefined reference to `__compiletime_assert_99'
>>> arch/arm64/include/asm/cmpxchg.h:99: \
>>> undefined reference to `__compiletime_assert_99
>>>
>>> Clang does not seems to be marking this macro as inline and causing
>>> above
>>> compilation issue due to BUILD_BUG().
>>
>> The only BUILD_BUG I see around here is if the size parameter (which
>> is
>> calculated using sizeof) is not known to be 1,2,4 or 8 at compile
>> time. It
>> would be interesting to know which call site is confusing clang in
>> this way
>> and what code is actually being emitted here.
>>
>> If it's just that __xchg_mb isn't being inlined into the
>> __xchg_wrapper
>> macro, then your patch should be ok, but I'd like to be sure it's not
>> something else. I'm also surprised you haven't see this crop up in
>> other
>> places.
> After digging further, we observed that inline definition was changed
> recently and causing this issue.
> Here is missing part of inline macro definition
> __attribute__((unused)).
>
> Commit abb2ea7dfd82 ("compiler, clang: suppress warning for unused
> static inline functions") have redefined the inline macro as below
> #define inline inline __attribute__((unused))
>
> But actual definition of inline macro defined compiler-gcc.h file as
> shown below.
> #define inline inline __attribute__((always_inline))
> notrace
>
> As always_inline attribute is missing in inline definition, compile
> may not inline macros __xchg_mb in
> arch/arm64/include/asm/cmpxchg.h file and leading to error.
>
> Some compilers may not honor inline as inline if always_inline
> attribute is removed because of
> -inline-threshold compiler options.
>
> Here is the change to fix this issue-
> diff --git a/include/linux/compiler-clang.h
> b/include/linux/compiler-clang.h
> index d614c5e..a0e6433 100644
> --- a/include/linux/compiler-clang.h
> +++ b/include/linux/compiler-clang.h
> @@ -22,4 +22,4 @@
> * directives. Suppress the warning in clang as well.
> */
> #undef inline
> -#define inline inline __attribute__((unused)) notrace
> +#define inline __attribute__((always_inline)) __attribute__((unused))
> notrace
>
> -Thanks, Prasad
Hi Will,
Here is the proper patch -
compiler, clang: Add always_inline attribute to inline
Commit abb2ea7dfd82 ("compiler, clang: suppress warning for unused
static inline functions") re-defining the 'inline' macro but
__attribute__((always_inline)) is missing. Some compilers may
not honor inline hint if always_iniline attribute is not there.
So add always_inline attribute to inline as done by
compiler-gcc.h file.
diff --git a/include/linux/compiler-clang.h
b/include/linux/compiler-clang.h
index d614c5e..400b0cd 100644
--- a/include/linux/compiler-clang.h
+++ b/include/linux/compiler-clang.h
@@ -22,4 +22,4 @@
* directives. Suppress the warning in clang as well.
*/
#undef inline
-#define inline inline __attribute__((unused)) notrace
+#define inline inline __attribute__((always_inline))
__attribute__((unused)) notrace
-Thanks, Prasad
>>
>> Will
--
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora
Forum,
Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-06-15 0:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-06-13 22:39 Using __always_inline attribute Sodagudi Prasad
2017-06-14 10:06 ` Will Deacon
2017-06-14 22:33 ` Sodagudi Prasad
2017-06-15 0:50 ` Sodagudi Prasad [this message]
2017-06-15 15:54 ` Mark Rutland
2017-06-19 15:53 ` [PATCH] compiler, clang: Add always_inline attribute to inline Prasad Sodagudi
2017-06-19 20:25 ` David Rientjes
2017-06-19 21:14 ` Sodagudi Prasad
2017-06-19 21:42 ` David Rientjes
2017-06-19 22:19 ` Sodagudi Prasad
2017-06-20 10:59 ` Mark Rutland
2017-06-20 23:12 ` David Rientjes
2017-06-22 9:43 ` Mark Rutland
2017-06-23 6:45 ` Sodagudi Prasad
2017-06-20 10:52 ` Mark Rutland
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=e77e6745b60629315b1b4f0e4fddd4bf@codeaurora.org \
--to=psodagud@codeaurora.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).