From: labbott@redhat.com (Laura Abbott)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v3] init: Fix false positives in W+X checking
Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2018 10:19:16 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <e87810b2-db26-ee13-731a-cde53185e977@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1525103946-29526-1-git-send-email-jhugo@codeaurora.org>
On 04/30/2018 08:59 AM, Jeffrey Hugo wrote:
> load_module() creates W+X mappings via __vmalloc_node_range() (from
> layout_and_allocate()->move_module()->module_alloc()) by using
> PAGE_KERNEL_EXEC. These mappings are later cleaned up via
> "call_rcu_sched(&freeinit->rcu, do_free_init)" from do_init_module().
>
> This is a problem because call_rcu_sched() queues work, which can be run
> after debug_checkwx() is run, resulting in a race condition. If hit, the
> race results in a nasty splat about insecure W+X mappings, which results
> in a poor user experience as these are not the mappings that
> debug_checkwx() is intended to catch.
>
> This issue is observed on multiple arm64 platforms, and has been
> artificially triggered on an x86 platform.
>
> Address the race by flushing the queued work before running the
> arch-defined mark_rodata_ro() which then calls debug_checkwx().
>
> Reported-by: Timur Tabi <timur@codeaurora.org>
> Reported-by: Jan Glauber <jan.glauber@caviumnetworks.com>
> Fixes: e1a58320a38d ("x86/mm: Warn on W^X mappings")
> Signed-off-by: Jeffrey Hugo <jhugo@codeaurora.org>
> Acked-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
> Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
> Acked-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
> ---
>
Acked-by: Laura Abbott <labbott@redhat.com>
If you don't have a tree for this to go through, I might suggest having
Kees take it.
> v3:
> -added comment to module code to establish matching connection
> -added acks by Kees, Ingo, and Will
>
> v2:
> -was "arm64: mm: Fix false positives in W+X checking" (see [1])
> -moved to common code based on review and confirmation of issue on x86
>
> [1] http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2018-April/573776.html
>
> init/main.c | 7 +++++++
> kernel/module.c | 5 +++++
> 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/init/main.c b/init/main.c
> index b795aa3..499d957 100644
> --- a/init/main.c
> +++ b/init/main.c
> @@ -1034,6 +1034,13 @@ static int __init set_debug_rodata(char *str)
> static void mark_readonly(void)
> {
> if (rodata_enabled) {
> + /*
> + * load_module() results in W+X mappings, which are cleaned up
> + * with call_rcu_sched(). Let's make sure that queued work is
> + * flushed so that we don't hit false positives looking for
> + * insecure pages which are W+X.
> + */
> + rcu_barrier_sched();
> mark_rodata_ro();
> rodata_test();
> } else
> diff --git a/kernel/module.c b/kernel/module.c
> index a6e43a5..7b71c3c 100644
> --- a/kernel/module.c
> +++ b/kernel/module.c
> @@ -3516,6 +3516,11 @@ static noinline int do_init_module(struct module *mod)
> * walking this with preempt disabled. In all the failure paths, we
> * call synchronize_sched(), but we don't want to slow down the success
> * path, so use actual RCU here.
> + * Note that module_alloc() on most architectures creates W+X page
> + * mappings which won't be cleaned up until do_free_init() runs. Any
> + * code such as mark_rodata_ro() which depends on those mappings to
> + * be cleaned up needs to sync with the queued work - ie
> + * rcu_barrier_sched()
> */
> call_rcu_sched(&freeinit->rcu, do_free_init);
> mutex_unlock(&module_mutex);
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-04-30 17:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-04-30 15:59 [PATCH v3] init: Fix false positives in W+X checking Jeffrey Hugo
2018-04-30 17:19 ` Laura Abbott [this message]
2018-04-30 18:40 ` Kees Cook
2018-04-30 20:49 ` Jeffrey Hugo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=e87810b2-db26-ee13-731a-cde53185e977@redhat.com \
--to=labbott@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).