From: gadiyar@ti.com (Anand Gadiyar)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: linux-next: omap2plus_defconfig not building
Date: Mon, 8 Nov 2010 11:35:16 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <eace9c309e371630528bc9f8fa208705@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1287488255.18646.110.camel@e102109-lin.cambridge.arm.com>
Catalin Marinas wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2010-10-19 at 11:18 +0100, Anand Gadiyar wrote:
> > Commit ba1b9be5cd in linux-next (ARM: Add SWP/SWPB emulation for ARMv7
> > processors (v5)) introduced arch/arm/kernel/swp_emulate.c. This file
> > gets compiled when the omap2plus_defconfig is built - the
> > omap2plus_defconfig builds OMAP2420, OMAP2430, OMAP3 and OMAP4 in one
> > image, and has CPU_V6 and CPU_V7 both enabled.
>
> This patch should fix it:
>
>
> ARM: Do not enable SWP emulation if CPU_V6 && CPU_V7
>
> From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
>
> This option uses LDREXB/STREXB to emulate SWPB but these instructions
> are not supported on all the ARMv6 processors.
>
> Reported-by: Anand Gadiyar <gadiyar@ti.com>
> Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
> Cc: Leif Lindholm <Leif.Lindholm@arm.com>
Hi Catalin, Leif,
I can't find this patch in linux-next. Hope we haven't missed it.
Tony acked this btw.
Strangely, the omap2plus_defconfig in v2.6.37-rc1 no longer gets
CONFIG_SWP_EMULATE enabled even without this patch - I can't figure
out why.
- Anand
> ---
> arch/arm/mm/Kconfig | 2 +-
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mm/Kconfig b/arch/arm/mm/Kconfig
> index 8493ed0..5195d61 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mm/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/arm/mm/Kconfig
> @@ -638,7 +638,7 @@ config ARM_THUMBEE
>
> config SWP_EMULATE
> bool "Emulate SWP/SWPB instructions"
> - depends on CPU_V7
> + depends on CPU_V7 && !CPU_V6
> select HAVE_PROC_CPU if PROC_FS
> default y if SMP
> help
>
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-11-08 6:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-10-19 10:18 linux-next: omap2plus_defconfig not building Anand Gadiyar
2010-10-19 11:37 ` Catalin Marinas
2010-10-19 12:14 ` Anand Gadiyar
2010-10-19 22:49 ` Tony Lindgren
2010-11-08 6:05 ` Anand Gadiyar [this message]
2010-11-08 9:38 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2010-11-08 9:48 ` Catalin Marinas
2010-11-08 10:14 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-11-08 10:20 ` Catalin Marinas
2010-11-08 10:25 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-11-08 10:31 ` Catalin Marinas
2010-11-25 13:54 ` Anand Gadiyar
2010-11-25 16:50 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-11-26 11:35 ` Anand Gadiyar
2010-11-26 11:45 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-11-26 12:22 ` Will Deacon
2010-11-26 12:28 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-11-26 12:38 ` Catalin Marinas
2010-11-26 12:55 ` Dave Martin
2010-11-26 13:00 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-11-26 13:31 ` Dave Martin
2010-11-26 13:53 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-11-26 12:33 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-12-23 19:55 ` Tony Lindgren
2010-12-23 20:15 ` Tony Lindgren
2010-12-23 20:30 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-12-23 21:06 ` Tony Lindgren
2011-01-07 3:59 ` Tony Lindgren
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=eace9c309e371630528bc9f8fa208705@mail.gmail.com \
--to=gadiyar@ti.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).