linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Maxime Chevallier <maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com>
To: Nicolai Buchwitz <nb@tipi-net.de>
Cc: "Andrew Lunn" <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
	davem@davemloft.net, "Eric Dumazet" <edumazet@google.com>,
	"Jakub Kicinski" <kuba@kernel.org>,
	"Paolo Abeni" <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	"Russell King" <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
	"Heiner Kallweit" <hkallweit1@gmail.com>,
	"Alexis Lothoré" <alexis.lothore@bootlin.com>,
	"Maxime Coquelin" <mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com>,
	"Alexandre Torgue" <alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com>,
	"Emil Renner Berthing" <kernel@esmil.dk>,
	"Minda Chen" <minda.chen@starfivetech.com>,
	"Neil Armstrong" <neil.armstrong@linaro.org>,
	"Kevin Hilman" <khilman@baylibre.com>,
	"Jerome Brunet" <jbrunet@baylibre.com>,
	"Martin Blumenstingl" <martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com>,
	"Jan Petrous" <jan.petrous@oss.nxp.com>,
	"Ovidiu Panait" <ovidiu.panait.rb@renesas.com>,
	Jose.Abreu@synopsys.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com, PKneuper@dspace.de,
	"David Laight" <david.laight.linux@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 2/6] net: stmmac: selftests: Validate EEE based on the actual LPI timer value
Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2026 14:36:37 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <eb8cf1f7-a272-47bb-b504-a91b8a9a2608@bootlin.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <00bfad8f52784677c6042ccd6c3fd6ed@tipi-net.de>



On 9/9/26 13:40, Nicolai Buchwitz wrote:
> On 9.9.2026 09:47, Maxime Chevallier wrote:
>> The EEE selftest is a 2-step test :
>>  - It validates that we enter in LPI mode with the
>>    irq_tx_path_in_lpi_mode_n counter
>>  - It then validates that we exit LPI when sending a frame, with the
>>    irq_tx_path_exit_lpi_mode_n counter.
>>
>> The current state of the test lacks 2 main things :
>>
>>  - We don't know exactly when was the previous frame sent (it's from the
>>    previous selftest)
>>
>>  - The timeout is hardcoded, while the LPI is entered after a
>>    user-configurable delay. On top of that, the timeout loop uses a
>>    pre-decrement iterator (--retries) that actually only iterate nine
>>    times, so 900ms while the default LPI value is 1 second.
>>
>> Let's therefore make it more deterministic :
>>
>>  - Send a frame at the beginning of the test
>>  - Wait for more than the lpi timer value, we timeout after about twice
>>    the value,
>>  - Then send another frame, and verify that we do go out of LPI, also
>>    with a timeout.
>>
>> Note that the test's goal isn't to validate the LPI timer value itself,
>> only that we enter/leave LPI mode.
>>
>> Fixes: 091810dbded9 ("net: stmmac: Introduce selftests support")
>> Signed-off-by: Maxime Chevallier <maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com>
>> ---
> 
>> [...]
> 
> Forget to mention in my last comment:
> The series seems to be broken. I can't find patch 3 and also the cover
> letter is missing on lore and my inbox?

Huh that's strange indeed, it's on lkml but not netdev@ ?

https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20260909074740.1247762-1-maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com/

meh I'll resend if need be

Maxime

> 
> Nicolai



      reply	other threads:[~2026-09-09 12:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-09  7:47 [PATCH net 0/6] net: stmmac: More selftest-related fixes Maxime Chevallier
2026-09-09  7:47 ` [PATCH net 6/6] net: stmmac: selftests: Account for alignment shift on dwmac1000 for Jumbo test Maxime Chevallier
     [not found] ` <20260909074740.1247762-3-maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com>
2026-09-09 11:32   ` [PATCH net 2/6] net: stmmac: selftests: Validate EEE based on the actual LPI timer value Nicolai Buchwitz
2026-09-09 12:40     ` Maxime Chevallier
2026-09-10 15:09     ` Maxime Chevallier
2026-09-09 11:40   ` Nicolai Buchwitz
2026-09-09 12:36     ` Maxime Chevallier [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=eb8cf1f7-a272-47bb-b504-a91b8a9a2608@bootlin.com \
    --to=maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com \
    --cc=Jose.Abreu@synopsys.com \
    --cc=PKneuper@dspace.de \
    --cc=alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com \
    --cc=alexis.lothore@bootlin.com \
    --cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=david.laight.linux@gmail.com \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=hkallweit1@gmail.com \
    --cc=jan.petrous@oss.nxp.com \
    --cc=jbrunet@baylibre.com \
    --cc=kernel@esmil.dk \
    --cc=khilman@baylibre.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com \
    --cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
    --cc=martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com \
    --cc=mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com \
    --cc=minda.chen@starfivetech.com \
    --cc=nb@tipi-net.de \
    --cc=neil.armstrong@linaro.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ovidiu.panait.rb@renesas.com \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).