From: Maxime Chevallier <maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com>
To: Nicolai Buchwitz <nb@tipi-net.de>
Cc: "Andrew Lunn" <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
davem@davemloft.net, "Eric Dumazet" <edumazet@google.com>,
"Jakub Kicinski" <kuba@kernel.org>,
"Paolo Abeni" <pabeni@redhat.com>,
"Russell King" <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
"Heiner Kallweit" <hkallweit1@gmail.com>,
"Alexis Lothoré" <alexis.lothore@bootlin.com>,
"Maxime Coquelin" <mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com>,
"Alexandre Torgue" <alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com>,
"Emil Renner Berthing" <kernel@esmil.dk>,
"Minda Chen" <minda.chen@starfivetech.com>,
"Neil Armstrong" <neil.armstrong@linaro.org>,
"Kevin Hilman" <khilman@baylibre.com>,
"Jerome Brunet" <jbrunet@baylibre.com>,
"Martin Blumenstingl" <martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com>,
"Jan Petrous" <jan.petrous@oss.nxp.com>,
"Ovidiu Panait" <ovidiu.panait.rb@renesas.com>,
Jose.Abreu@synopsys.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com, PKneuper@dspace.de,
"David Laight" <david.laight.linux@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 2/6] net: stmmac: selftests: Validate EEE based on the actual LPI timer value
Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2026 14:36:37 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <eb8cf1f7-a272-47bb-b504-a91b8a9a2608@bootlin.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <00bfad8f52784677c6042ccd6c3fd6ed@tipi-net.de>
On 9/9/26 13:40, Nicolai Buchwitz wrote:
> On 9.9.2026 09:47, Maxime Chevallier wrote:
>> The EEE selftest is a 2-step test :
>> - It validates that we enter in LPI mode with the
>> irq_tx_path_in_lpi_mode_n counter
>> - It then validates that we exit LPI when sending a frame, with the
>> irq_tx_path_exit_lpi_mode_n counter.
>>
>> The current state of the test lacks 2 main things :
>>
>> - We don't know exactly when was the previous frame sent (it's from the
>> previous selftest)
>>
>> - The timeout is hardcoded, while the LPI is entered after a
>> user-configurable delay. On top of that, the timeout loop uses a
>> pre-decrement iterator (--retries) that actually only iterate nine
>> times, so 900ms while the default LPI value is 1 second.
>>
>> Let's therefore make it more deterministic :
>>
>> - Send a frame at the beginning of the test
>> - Wait for more than the lpi timer value, we timeout after about twice
>> the value,
>> - Then send another frame, and verify that we do go out of LPI, also
>> with a timeout.
>>
>> Note that the test's goal isn't to validate the LPI timer value itself,
>> only that we enter/leave LPI mode.
>>
>> Fixes: 091810dbded9 ("net: stmmac: Introduce selftests support")
>> Signed-off-by: Maxime Chevallier <maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com>
>> ---
>
>> [...]
>
> Forget to mention in my last comment:
> The series seems to be broken. I can't find patch 3 and also the cover
> letter is missing on lore and my inbox?
Huh that's strange indeed, it's on lkml but not netdev@ ?
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20260909074740.1247762-1-maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com/
meh I'll resend if need be
Maxime
>
> Nicolai
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-09 12:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-09 7:47 [PATCH net 0/6] net: stmmac: More selftest-related fixes Maxime Chevallier
2026-09-09 7:47 ` [PATCH net 6/6] net: stmmac: selftests: Account for alignment shift on dwmac1000 for Jumbo test Maxime Chevallier
[not found] ` <20260909074740.1247762-3-maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com>
2026-09-09 11:32 ` [PATCH net 2/6] net: stmmac: selftests: Validate EEE based on the actual LPI timer value Nicolai Buchwitz
2026-09-09 12:40 ` Maxime Chevallier
2026-09-10 15:09 ` Maxime Chevallier
2026-09-09 11:40 ` Nicolai Buchwitz
2026-09-09 12:36 ` Maxime Chevallier [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=eb8cf1f7-a272-47bb-b504-a91b8a9a2608@bootlin.com \
--to=maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com \
--cc=Jose.Abreu@synopsys.com \
--cc=PKneuper@dspace.de \
--cc=alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com \
--cc=alexis.lothore@bootlin.com \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=david.laight.linux@gmail.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=hkallweit1@gmail.com \
--cc=jan.petrous@oss.nxp.com \
--cc=jbrunet@baylibre.com \
--cc=kernel@esmil.dk \
--cc=khilman@baylibre.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com \
--cc=mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com \
--cc=minda.chen@starfivetech.com \
--cc=nb@tipi-net.de \
--cc=neil.armstrong@linaro.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ovidiu.panait.rb@renesas.com \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).