From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: rnayak@codeaurora.org (Rajendra Nayak) Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2018 14:25:07 +0530 Subject: [PATCH v2 9/9] PM / Domains: Add dev_pm_domain_attach_by_id() to manage multi PM domains In-Reply-To: References: <20180529100421.31022-1-ulf.hansson@linaro.org> <20180529100421.31022-10-ulf.hansson@linaro.org> Message-ID: To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 05/30/2018 08:00 PM, Jon Hunter wrote: >>> My only other comments on this series are ... >>> >>> 1. I think it would be nice to have an dev_pm_domain_attach_by_name() and >>> that the DT binding has a 'power-domain-names' property. >> I think it makes sense, but my plan was to do that as second step on >> top. Are you okay with that as well? > Yes that is fine with me. Ulf, do you have a patch for this? I am working on moving some of qcom remoteproc drivers to use this series and it will help to have a dev_pm_domain_attach_by_name() api. Thanks, Rajendra -- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation