From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: smuckle@codeaurora.org (smuckle at codeaurora.org) Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2010 17:47:17 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [RFC PATCH] smp: parallel smp boot option In-Reply-To: <20100621223146.GE13624@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> References: <1277156422-9130-1-git-send-email-dwalker@codeaurora.org> <20100621220030.GC13624@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <1277158949.17092.61.camel@c-dwalke-linux.qualcomm.com> <20100621223146.GE13624@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> Message-ID: To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org >> Your OK with this hook? I was thinking it might be better to check if >> it's the book cpu or the secondary here instead of in >> arch/arm/mach-msm . > > Not entirely. It would appear that it means you can never used a > compressed kernel on MSM, since if you do, you'll have all CPUs in > the system decompressing the kernel simultaneously. > > If we have to have this hook, how about making it a weak reference > rather than something dealt with by the configuration system? This is something we're using until we get a more complex/featureful bootchain in place. It probably only has value in development platforms/early enablement. A weak reference seems fine or we could drop it alltogether. thanks, Steve -- Sent by an employee of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum.