From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.4 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5517EC433E0 for ; Thu, 21 Jan 2021 11:34:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from merlin.infradead.org (merlin.infradead.org [205.233.59.134]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DEFE7238EC for ; Thu, 21 Jan 2021 11:34:28 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org DEFE7238EC Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=arm.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=merlin.20170209; h=Sender:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:From: References:To:Subject:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=U7gzq/GEEpVIv94wRCDuPNXZTTjE48PcjP6bQk97uwk=; b=sEUwtGTRaqZF790QXassY9xcr I1kWs/iQ7WNtkfvAd4Ae0GIT8jzRdw8xMnBkWxxARgTS34qmZAzZDg4aoLz33DrUhOOuhiqLHJWU5 xs8+xXpv9aSkvThdgVl3EiIoK6yXMRj/fOc1B3g6gms1uKB0X9PkK7oVFspyyoqXgADoRH96m/Zjs ISK70fFluHCiy+PDsVL+WoncGKACCDS2eyIoWmjulHnxsfjPQ0uYN6MXwPeJURq+8St3wQrdlNfn+ 8NFEpzDk+Au7RrWdpsfvBrGR4EuztjwPfsDOz1kf1rKmmLPQ2Pdx0YmIHJeMBTZW2QXhu6aH7MsZf Mkr0XmcFQ==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=merlin.infradead.org) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1l2YC4-0002rU-LZ; Thu, 21 Jan 2021 11:32:04 +0000 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1l2YBk-0002mr-8p for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Thu, 21 Jan 2021 11:31:46 +0000 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 795BD11B3; Thu, 21 Jan 2021 03:31:43 -0800 (PST) Received: from [10.37.8.32] (unknown [10.37.8.32]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8ABC03F719; Thu, 21 Jan 2021 03:31:41 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/5] arm64: ARMv8.5-A: MTE: Add async mode support To: Andrey Konovalov References: <20210118183033.41764-1-vincenzo.frascino@arm.com> From: Vincenzo Frascino Message-ID: Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2021 11:35:32 +0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.10.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Language: en-US X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20210121_063144_404252_0A4D36D7 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 14.88 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Branislav Rankov , Marco Elver , Catalin Marinas , Evgenii Stepanov , LKML , kasan-dev , Alexander Potapenko , Linux ARM , Andrey Ryabinin , Will Deacon , Dmitry Vyukov Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org Hi Andrey, On 1/19/21 6:09 PM, Andrey Konovalov wrote: > Hi Vincenzo, > > This change has multiple conflicts with the KASAN testing patches that > are currently in the mm tree. If Andrew decides to send all of them > during RC, then this should be good to go through arm64. Otherwise, I > guess this will need to go through mm as well. So you probably need to > rebase this on top of those patches in any case. > Could you please let me know on which tree do you want me to rebase my patches? I almost completed the requested changes. Thank you! > Thanks! -- Regards, Vincenzo _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel