From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: dingtianhong@huawei.com (Ding Tianhong) Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2017 17:41:27 +0800 Subject: [PATCH 2/2] arch_timer: acpi: add hisi timer erratum data In-Reply-To: <48bb19c9-d1f3-a5c1-ec82-4b19d45f88fd@suse.de> References: <1485254391-51551-1-git-send-email-guohanjun@huawei.com> <1485254391-51551-3-git-send-email-guohanjun@huawei.com> <20170124105717.GB6277@leverpostej> <589D6776.2010400@huawei.com> <20170216091454.GA2160@mai> <48bb19c9-d1f3-a5c1-ec82-4b19d45f88fd@suse.de> Message-ID: To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 2017/2/16 17:32, Alexander Graf wrote: > > > On 16/02/2017 10:14, Daniel Lezcano wrote: >> On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 09:42:11AM +0100, Alexander Graf wrote: >> >> [ ... ] >> >>>>>> I believe Marc is looking at some rework in this area which may enable >>>>>> this, so please wait for that to appear. >>>>> Yeah, I'm implementing a semi-flexible way to add new quirk types, and >>>>> the last thing I want to see is two (or more) tables describing the same >>>>> thing. >>>> >>>> Kindly ping, if you have patches in hand, I can test against our platforms, >>>> thank you very much. >>> >>> Any progress on this? I'm not a big fan of stalling erratum fixes upstream >>> because of potential future refactoring. >> >> The fix is in the tip tree, soon in v4.11-rc1 when the merge will be finished. >> >> http://goo.gl/x90qwE >> http://goo.gl/asCBBD > > Oh, I missed that. Sorry for the fuss :). > > > Alex > Hi, I thinks the tip tree is only applied the erratum for DT, not for ACPI, the patch for ACPI is not applied yet, so the work isn't finished. o<o< Thanks Ding > _______________________________________________ > linux-arm-kernel mailing list > linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel > > . >