public inbox for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Xu Kuohai <xukuohai@huawei.com>
To: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: <bpf@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
	Zi Shen Lim <zlim.lnx@gmail.com>,
	Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
	Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>, Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>,
	Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>,
	John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
	KP Singh <kpsingh@kernel.org>,
	"David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org>,
	David Ahern <dsahern@kernel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>, <x86@kernel.org>,
	<hpa@zytor.com>, Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
	Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@kernel.org>,
	Pasha Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@soleen.com>,
	Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>,
	Daniel Kiss <daniel.kiss@arm.com>,
	Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com>,
	Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>,
	Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
	Peter Collingbourne <pcc@google.com>,
	Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>, Delyan Kratunov <delyank@fb.com>,
	Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v5 2/6] ftrace: Fix deadloop caused by direct call in ftrace selftest
Date: Thu, 26 May 2022 17:45:10 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ee9aba0e-b6ef-2cbb-acbd-76f807b11e62@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Yo4ymwu92gM75/Z5@FVFF77S0Q05N>

On 5/25/2022 9:43 PM, Mark Rutland wrote:
> On Wed, May 18, 2022 at 09:16:34AM -0400, Xu Kuohai wrote:
>> After direct call is enabled for arm64, ftrace selftest enters a
>> dead loop:
> 
> IIUC this means that patch 1 alone is broken, and presumably this patch should
> have been part of it?

No, patch 1 is not broken. This patch fixes bug in the selftest
trampoline, not bug in patch 1.

> 
>> <trace_selftest_dynamic_test_func>:
>> 00  bti     c
>> 01  mov     x9, x30                            <trace_direct_tramp>:
>> 02  bl      <trace_direct_tramp>    ---------->     ret
>>                                                      |
>>                                          lr/x30 is 03, return to 03
>>                                                      |
>> 03  mov     w0, #0x0   <-----------------------------|
>>      |                                               |
>>      |                   dead loop!                  |
>>      |                                               |
>> 04  ret   ---- lr/x30 is still 03, go back to 03 ----|
>>
>> The reason is that when the direct caller trace_direct_tramp() returns
>> to the patched function trace_selftest_dynamic_test_func(), lr is still
>> the address after the instrumented instruction in the patched function,
>> so when the patched function exits, it returns to itself!
>>
>> To fix this issue, we need to restore lr before trace_direct_tramp()
>> exits, so rewrite a dedicated trace_direct_tramp() for arm64.
> 
> As mentioned on patch 1 I'd prefer we solved this through indirection, which
> would avoid the need for this and would make things more robust generally by
> keeping the unusual calling convention private to the patch-site and regular
> trampoline.
>

IIUC, we still need to restore x30 before returning from the trampoline
even through indirection, so this bug is still there.

> Thanks,
> Mark.
> 
>> Reported-by: Li Huafei <lihuafei1@huawei.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Xu Kuohai <xukuohai@huawei.com>
>> ---
>>  arch/arm64/include/asm/ftrace.h  | 10 ++++++++++
>>  arch/arm64/kernel/entry-ftrace.S | 10 ++++++++++
>>  kernel/trace/trace_selftest.c    |  2 ++
>>  3 files changed, 22 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/ftrace.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/ftrace.h
>> index 14a35a5df0a1..6f6b184e72fb 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/ftrace.h
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/ftrace.h
>> @@ -126,6 +126,16 @@ static inline bool arch_syscall_match_sym_name(const char *sym,
>>  	 */
>>  	return !strcmp(sym + 8, name);
>>  }
>> +
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_FTRACE_SELFTEST
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_DYNAMIC_FTRACE_WITH_DIRECT_CALLS
>> +
>> +#define trace_direct_tramp trace_direct_tramp
>> +extern void trace_direct_tramp(void);
>> +
>> +#endif /* CONFIG_DYNAMIC_FTRACE_WITH_DIRECT_CALLS */
>> +#endif /* CONFIG_FTRACE_SELFTEST */
>> +
>>  #endif /* ifndef __ASSEMBLY__ */
>>  
>>  #endif /* __ASM_FTRACE_H */
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/entry-ftrace.S b/arch/arm64/kernel/entry-ftrace.S
>> index dfe62c55e3a2..a47e87d4d3dd 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/entry-ftrace.S
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/entry-ftrace.S
>> @@ -357,3 +357,13 @@ SYM_CODE_START(return_to_handler)
>>  	ret
>>  SYM_CODE_END(return_to_handler)
>>  #endif /* CONFIG_FUNCTION_GRAPH_TRACER */
>> +
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_FTRACE_SELFTEST
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_DYNAMIC_FTRACE_WITH_DIRECT_CALLS
>> +SYM_FUNC_START(trace_direct_tramp)
>> +	mov x10, x30
>> +	mov x30, x9
>> +	ret x10
>> +SYM_FUNC_END(trace_direct_tramp)
>> +#endif /* CONFIG_DYNAMIC_FTRACE_WITH_DIRECT_CALLS */
>> +#endif /* CONFIG_FTRACE_SELFTEST */
>> diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_selftest.c b/kernel/trace/trace_selftest.c
>> index abcadbe933bb..e7ccd0d10c39 100644
>> --- a/kernel/trace/trace_selftest.c
>> +++ b/kernel/trace/trace_selftest.c
>> @@ -785,8 +785,10 @@ static struct fgraph_ops fgraph_ops __initdata  = {
>>  };
>>  
>>  #ifdef CONFIG_DYNAMIC_FTRACE_WITH_DIRECT_CALLS
>> +#ifndef trace_direct_tramp
>>  noinline __noclone static void trace_direct_tramp(void) { }
>>  #endif
>> +#endif
>>  
>>  /*
>>   * Pretty much the same than for the function tracer from which the selftest
>> -- 
>> 2.30.2
>>
> .


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2022-05-26  9:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-05-18 13:16 [PATCH bpf-next v5 0/6] bpf trampoline for arm64 Xu Kuohai
2022-05-18 13:16 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 1/6] arm64: ftrace: Add ftrace direct call support Xu Kuohai
2022-05-23  1:39   ` KP Singh
2022-05-25 13:38   ` Mark Rutland
2022-05-26  9:45     ` Xu Kuohai
2022-05-26 10:06       ` Mark Rutland
2022-05-26 14:48         ` Xu Kuohai
2022-06-06 16:35           ` Mark Rutland
2022-06-09  4:27             ` Xu Kuohai
2022-08-09 17:03               ` Florent Revest
2022-08-10  8:10                 ` Xu Kuohai
2022-05-18 13:16 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 2/6] ftrace: Fix deadloop caused by direct call in ftrace selftest Xu Kuohai
2022-05-25 13:43   ` Mark Rutland
2022-05-26  9:45     ` Xu Kuohai [this message]
2022-05-18 13:16 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 3/6] bpf: Remove is_valid_bpf_tramp_flags() Xu Kuohai
2022-05-25 13:45   ` Mark Rutland
2022-05-26  9:45     ` Xu Kuohai
2022-05-26 10:12       ` Mark Rutland
2022-05-26 14:46         ` Xu Kuohai
2022-05-18 13:16 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 4/6] bpf, arm64: Impelment bpf_arch_text_poke() for arm64 Xu Kuohai
2022-05-23  1:41   ` KP Singh
2022-05-25 14:10   ` Mark Rutland
2022-05-26  9:45     ` Xu Kuohai
2022-05-26 10:34       ` Mark Rutland
2022-05-26 14:47         ` Xu Kuohai
2022-05-18 13:16 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 5/6] bpf, arm64: bpf trampoline " Xu Kuohai
2022-05-20 21:18   ` Alexei Starovoitov
2022-05-23 16:09     ` Mark Rutland
2022-05-23  1:36   ` KP Singh
2022-05-18 13:16 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 6/6] selftests/bpf: Fix trivial typo in fentry_fexit.c Xu Kuohai

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ee9aba0e-b6ef-2cbb-acbd-76f807b11e62@huawei.com \
    --to=xukuohai@huawei.com \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ardb@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=daniel.kiss@arm.com \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=delyank@fb.com \
    --cc=dsahern@kernel.org \
    --cc=hawk@kernel.org \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
    --cc=kafai@fb.com \
    --cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=memxor@gmail.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pasha.tatashin@soleen.com \
    --cc=pcc@google.com \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    --cc=songliubraving@fb.com \
    --cc=steven.price@arm.com \
    --cc=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=yhs@fb.com \
    --cc=yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org \
    --cc=zlim.lnx@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox