Re: ❌ FAIL (MISSED 2 of 87): Test report for for-kernelci (6.9.0-rc4, arm-next, 6a71d290)

[James Clark <james.clark@arm.com>]

On 22/04/2024 18:08, Will Deacon wrote:
> [+Suzuki, Mike and James]
> 
> On Fri, Apr 19, 2024 at 08:30:09PM -0000, cki-project@redhat.com wrote:
>> Hi, we tested your kernel and here are the results:
>>
>>     Overall result: FAILED
>>              Merge: OK
>>            Compile: OK
>>               Test: FAILED
>>
>>
>> Kernel information:
>>     Commit message: Merge branch 'for-next/core' into for-kernelci
>>
>> You can find all the details about the test run at
>>     https://datawarehouse.cki-project.org/kcidb/checkouts/redhat:1260423326
>>
>> One or more kernel tests failed:
>>     Unrecognized or new issues:
>>         Boot test
>>              aarch64
>>                    Logs: https://datawarehouse.cki-project.org/kcidb/tests/redhat:1260423326-aarch64-kernel_upt_4
>>                    Non-passing ran subtests:
>>                        ❌ FAIL distribution/kpkginstall/journalctl-check
> 
> I'm not sure if it's the root cause, but the logs here have a tonne of
> coresight ETM splats (I included one at the end of the mail).
> 
> https://s3.amazonaws.com/arr-cki-prod-trusted-artifacts/trusted-artifacts/1260423326/test_aarch64/6670265232/artifacts/run.done.01/job.01/recipes/15985953/tasks/5/results/1713555252/logs/journalctl.log
> 
> Jonathan has recently done a bunch of work fixing up the ->parent
> pointers for PMU devices, but I don't see anything going near the
> coresight drivers so this is probably unrelated.
> 
> Will
> 
> --->8
> 
> Apr 19 15:33:38 hpe-apollo-cn99xx-03.khw.eng.rdu2.dc.redhat.com kernel: CSCFG registered etm103
> Apr 19 15:33:38 hpe-apollo-cn99xx-03.khw.eng.rdu2.dc.redhat.com kernel: coresight etm103: CPU103: etm v4.1 initialized
> Apr 19 15:33:38 hpe-apollo-cn99xx-03.khw.eng.rdu2.dc.redhat.com kernel: sysfs: cannot create duplicate filename '/devices/system/container/ACPI0004:00/ARMHC9FE:00/funnel0/connections/in:0'

Hi Will,

It looks like multiple ETMs are described as being connected to the same
port on a funnel. Those connections to build the filename string all
come from the firmware. I don't think there are any changes since 6.8 in
Coresight that would affect device registration.

I did try to find some previous runs on that machine and I found this
message
(https://s3.amazonaws.com/arr-cki-prod-trusted-artifacts/trusted-artifacts/1260423326/test_aarch64/6670265232/artifacts/run.done.01/job.01/recipes/15985953/tasks/5/results/1713555252/logs/journalctl.log):

  "ETM4 disabled due to firmware bug"

Although I couldn't find where that string comes from. It seems to me
like there has been a firmware change on that machine recently, or this
is the first time it's been booted with Coresight enabled.

Also possible is that we removed the kernel part that disabled it due to
whatever that flag is, but I don't think that's happened. Maybe Suzuki
knows about that message and could comment?

Thanks

James

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel