From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 819F8C433F5 for ; Wed, 11 May 2022 13:16:16 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:From:References:Cc:To:Subject: MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=xv97AQS4j1vd/Y6hsbMaJzardQaLVUcyABQ1PEa4Yeo=; b=qX90i3LvyTmBAy N9/0dyxtbfrJB3+d2SItETblH8Wtbyqhal6WWnK2/VK7mrTCY0hiAb3SPFM7OCKE4aTsbJRGVKHxX XWMChzEyrxh5pwD7zzQJoUHCJI/4tkKO9NWMlRrhzQ1w3XQFtCLdmpIFN92HF4UOx7dJV7UfI+B/w R74BPspH7RCqEN8Bf4LJoUv1aBwgSAUYmcm6caADiQh3AKzb8EtJ2WGVYlPgBV75p2pm6GHCv+gtq qF/K2NNDHmQyJHFwMe+Qriz4YgqVRZnqkiFrrXOWQBm2Yy0qNRSk+9yr6rw75BP47+FgOdNUj1lFJ Npn6iNhYiV/mfN9pEeGA==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1nomBP-006uM0-7f; Wed, 11 May 2022 13:15:15 +0000 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1nomBM-006uKu-9U for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 11 May 2022 13:15:13 +0000 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E40CED1; Wed, 11 May 2022 06:15:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.99.12] (unknown [172.31.20.19]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3842C3F66F; Wed, 11 May 2022 06:15:10 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 11 May 2022 14:15:09 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.9.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: defconfig: Enable modules for arm displays Content-Language: en-US To: Mark Brown , Liviu Dudau Cc: Sudeep Holla , carsten.haitzler@arm.com, soc@kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Robin Murphy References: <20220509125510.152114-1-carsten.haitzler@foss.arm.com> <20220510111545.uqatdfthc6lv5p7i@bogus> <02ce0958-7e19-3315-a39f-548cf41e1f0b@foss.arm.com> From: Carsten Haitzler Organization: Arm Ltd. In-Reply-To: X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20220511_061512_426711_E0DAFC1D X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 14.68 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On 5/11/22 14:13, Mark Brown wrote: > On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 09:06:52PM +0100, Liviu Dudau wrote: > >> The quickest way is to harmonise the treatment of IRQs between tda998x and tda9950. >> The former treats the IRQ as optional, the later as mandatory. Given that (according >> to comments in the code) TDA998X is actually a TDA9989+TDA9950, it makes sense to >> treat the lack of IRQ the same way (make it optional, IMHO). > > The check in tda9950 is sensible enough, the device relies on interrupts > to report the status of CEC operations so we'd need to poll constantly > which doesn't seem great. It wouldn't be *so* bad for things initiated > by the device but given that CEC is a network and we might get messages > from other devices in the system at any time we'd need to poll > constantly even when otherwise idle which doesn't seem good. I sent a > patch to lower the level of the log message, hopefully that's OK for > people. Ah - well either way- job done. :) No need to spin up a patch then :) _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel