Linux-ARM-Kernel Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Justin Swartz <justin.swartz@risingedge.co.za>
To: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
	Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
	linux-spi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] spi: mt7621: allow GPIO chip select lines
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2024 13:06:54 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <f068eab7d873b9cdfae41b5413ebdbb8@risingedge.co.za> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ff184df8-1917-456b-97c8-bc270987bd55@collabora.com>

On 2024-03-18 12:16, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote:
> Il 16/03/24 02:03, Justin Swartz ha scritto:
>> Extract a magic number, from mt7621_spi_probe(), used to
>> declare the number of chip select lines (which co-incides
>> with the native chip select count of 2) to a macro.
>> 
>> Use the newly defined MT7621_NATIVE_CS_COUNT macro to
>> instead populate both the spi_controller's max_native_cs
>> and num_chipselect members.
>> 
>> Declare that the spi_controller should use_gpio_descriptors
>> if present in the device properties (such as those declared
>> in the cs-gpio property of a "ralink,mt7621-spi" compatible
>> device-tree node) so that the SPI core will recalculcate
>> num_chipselect to account for the GPIO descriptors that
>> it should have populated in the cs_gpiod array member.
>> 
>> Remove the assignment of mt7621_spi_transfer_one_message()
>> to the spi_controller's transfer_one_message hook.
>> 
>> Refactor the mt7621_spi_transfer_one_message() logic into
>> mt7621_spi_prepare_message() and mt7621_spi_transfer_one()
>> and assign both to the spi_controller's prepare_message
>> and transfer_one hooks respectively.
>> 
>> Migrate the call mt7621_spi_transfer_one_message() made to
>> mt7621_spi_flush() just before chip select deactivation,
>> to the end of mt7621_spi_write_half_duplex() to ensure
>> that any pending data is shifted out of MOSI before the SPI
>> core deactivates the chip select line.
>> 
>> As chip select activation is now taken care of by the SPI
>> core, due to the use of the transfer_one hook instead of
>> transfer_one_message, the calls to mt7621_spi_set_cs()
>> from mt7621_spi_transfer_one_message() have fallen away.
>> 
>> And although the SPI core will handle activation for GPIO
>> chip select lines behind the scenes, it requires a callback
>> to allow the driver to perform controller-specific
>> operations to control its native chip select lines.
>> 
>> Rename mt7621_spi_set_cs() to mt7621_spi_set_native_cs()
>> and make sure that it takes into account the activation
>> polarity of the chip select line it's acting upon, as the
>> passed enable parameter represents the desired line level
>> and not the desired activation state, and then assign
>> mt7621_set_cs() to the spi_controller's set_cs hook.
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Justin Swartz <justin.swartz@risingedge.co.za>
> 
> Reviewed-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
> <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>

Thank you very much for the review.

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2024-03-18 11:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-03-15  1:57 [PATCH] spi: mt7621: allow GPIO chip select lines Justin Swartz
2024-03-15 14:45 ` Mark Brown
2024-03-15 16:23   ` Justin Swartz
2024-03-15 17:47     ` Mark Brown
2024-03-15 20:21       ` Justin Swartz
2024-03-15 20:41         ` Mark Brown
2024-03-16  1:03           ` [PATCH v2] " Justin Swartz
2024-03-18 10:16             ` AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2024-03-18 11:06               ` Justin Swartz [this message]
2024-03-25 17:44             ` Mark Brown

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=f068eab7d873b9cdfae41b5413ebdbb8@risingedge.co.za \
    --to=justin.swartz@risingedge.co.za \
    --cc=angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-spi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox