From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: eric.y.miao@gmail.com (Eric Miao) Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 22:34:14 +0800 Subject: My first patch to the mailist, but being held In-Reply-To: References: <1251814118.16594.292.camel@macbook.infradead.org> Message-ID: To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 10:25 PM, Wan ZongShun wrote: > Dear David, > > 2009/9/1 David Woodhouse : >> On Tue, 2009-09-01 at 22:05 +0800, Wan ZongShun wrote: >>> >>> Yes, I think so too, due to I never meet this type 'held' in LAKML and >>> LKML, so I am amazed at this 'held' in the list. >> >> Not all of the mailman settings were imported from the old list to the >> new one. If the moderators want to increase the size limit, they are >> free to do that -- the hardware can certainly cope. >> >> But Eric is right that patches above 40KiB are fairly suspect anyway -- >> why is it so large? > > The patch is one of the series patches of changing my w90x900 platform > architecture, originally, I submitted nine patches to mend my > platform, Russell has reviewed them and > hoped me to re-arrange the patches, so I Integrated the nine patches > into three ones. > > I just ignore the size of patch issue. > You can try 'git format-patch -M' to shrink the size of the patch significantly if renaming is involved.