[patch for 2.6.31] zaurus c3000 aka spitz: fix resume

[eric.y.miao@gmail.com (Eric Miao)]

On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 6:41 AM, Russell King - ARM Linux
<linux@arm.linux.org.uk> wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 09:19:32PM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
>> On Wed 2009-09-09 19:23:40, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
>> > On Wed, Sep 09, 2009 at 10:37:41PM +0800, Eric Miao wrote:
>> > > On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 3:50 PM, Pavel Machek<pavel@ucw.cz> wrote:
>> > > > Hi, Linus!
>> > > >
>> > > > Spitz resume was broken for year or likely two, and it would be very
>> > > > nice to fix it for 2.6.31 release. One liner is below, and it really
>> > > > can not harm. It already is in Eric's fix queue, so pulling that for
>> > > > .31 should work, too.
>> > > >
>> > >
>> > > This should be sitting in rmk's git tree and I'm not sure if Russell
>> > > has sent the pull request already.
>> >
>> > It's just Pavel being his obnoxious impatient self...
>>
>> Aha, Russell, being polite and helpful, as usual.
>>
>> Only that, you know, you missed the deadline, so... perhaps I had
>> reason to be impatient?
>
> I missed the deadline because I was waiting on others to sort out telling
> me whether a bugfix patch was actually correct, and then it took several
> days and mails to get an attributation line out of them. ?I finally got
> that yesterday, and since I'm not doing kernel work (in fact, I'm hardly
> in front of the computer at the moment) these things are going to _HAVE_
> to wait until this weekend.
>
> By agreement with Linus, I do not send pull requests more often than once
> a week, absolute maximum. ?So if I've something pending in the queue, I
> hold off sending the queue until that issue is resolved.
>
> Don't like it? ?Tough. ?This is the workflow that I've been forced into
> by other flame wars. ?It would be my personal preference to ensure that
> fixes make their way in a timely manner into mainline, but due to that,
> it's just not possible.
>

Pavel,

It is still possible to get this into the stable release so take easy.