From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: eric.y.miao@gmail.com (Eric Miao) Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 09:19:19 +0800 Subject: [patch for 2.6.31] zaurus c3000 aka spitz: fix resume In-Reply-To: <20090910224159.GA4360@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> References: <20090909075024.GA1400@ucw.cz> <20090909182340.GA5235@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20090910191932.GA23721@elf.ucw.cz> <20090910224159.GA4360@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> Message-ID: To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 6:41 AM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 09:19:32PM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote: >> On Wed 2009-09-09 19:23:40, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: >> > On Wed, Sep 09, 2009 at 10:37:41PM +0800, Eric Miao wrote: >> > > On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 3:50 PM, Pavel Machek wrote: >> > > > Hi, Linus! >> > > > >> > > > Spitz resume was broken for year or likely two, and it would be very >> > > > nice to fix it for 2.6.31 release. One liner is below, and it really >> > > > can not harm. It already is in Eric's fix queue, so pulling that for >> > > > .31 should work, too. >> > > > >> > > >> > > This should be sitting in rmk's git tree and I'm not sure if Russell >> > > has sent the pull request already. >> > >> > It's just Pavel being his obnoxious impatient self... >> >> Aha, Russell, being polite and helpful, as usual. >> >> Only that, you know, you missed the deadline, so... perhaps I had >> reason to be impatient? > > I missed the deadline because I was waiting on others to sort out telling > me whether a bugfix patch was actually correct, and then it took several > days and mails to get an attributation line out of them. ?I finally got > that yesterday, and since I'm not doing kernel work (in fact, I'm hardly > in front of the computer at the moment) these things are going to _HAVE_ > to wait until this weekend. > > By agreement with Linus, I do not send pull requests more often than once > a week, absolute maximum. ?So if I've something pending in the queue, I > hold off sending the queue until that issue is resolved. > > Don't like it? ?Tough. ?This is the workflow that I've been forced into > by other flame wars. ?It would be my personal preference to ensure that > fixes make their way in a timely manner into mainline, but due to that, > it's just not possible. > Pavel, It is still possible to get this into the stable release so take easy.