linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: eric.y.miao@gmail.com (Eric Miao)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [RESENT PATCH] Don't disable irqs in set_next_event and set_mode callbacks
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2009 18:51:29 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <f17812d70911260251r2089c810ude2339a3cf12ee94@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1259231164-21242-1-git-send-email-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>

> Hello,
>
> @Eric: You wrote you were not sure about this patch. ?Would you prefer adding a
> WARN_ON in a first step?
>

Yes, that will be a good idea.

> @Remy: You planned to test this back in September. ?Did you?
>
> Best regards
> Uwe
>
> ?arch/arm/mach-at91/at91rm9200_time.c ?| ? 14 --------------
> ?arch/arm/mach-at91/at91sam926x_time.c | ? ?6 +-----
> ?arch/arm/mach-nomadik/timer.c ? ? ? ? | ? ?9 +--------
> ?arch/arm/mach-pxa/time.c ? ? ? ? ? ? ?| ? 10 +---------
> ?arch/arm/mach-sa1100/time.c ? ? ? ? ? | ? ?8 +-------
> ?5 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 43 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-at91/at91rm9200_time.c b/arch/arm/mach-at91/at91rm9200_time.c
> index 309f351..f27ccf6 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-at91/at91rm9200_time.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-at91/at91rm9200_time.c
> @@ -132,24 +132,11 @@ clkevt32k_mode(enum clock_event_mode mode, struct clock_event_device *dev)
> ?static int
> ?clkevt32k_next_event(unsigned long delta, struct clock_event_device *dev)
> ?{
> - ? ? ? unsigned long ? flags;
> ? ? ? ?u32 ? ? ? ? ? ? alm;
> ? ? ? ?int ? ? ? ? ? ? status = 0;
>
> ? ? ? ?BUG_ON(delta < 2);
>
> - ? ? ? /* Use "raw" primitives so we behave correctly on RT kernels. */
> - ? ? ? raw_local_irq_save(flags);
> -
> - ? ? ? /*
> - ? ? ? ?* According to Thomas Gleixner irqs are already disabled here. ?Simply
> - ? ? ? ?* removing raw_local_irq_save above (and the matching
> - ? ? ? ?* raw_local_irq_restore) was not accepted. ?See
> - ? ? ? ?* http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ports.arm.kernel/41174
> - ? ? ? ?* So for now (2008-11-20) just warn once if irqs were not disabled ...
> - ? ? ? ?*/
> - ? ? ? WARN_ON_ONCE(!raw_irqs_disabled_flags(flags));
> -
> ? ? ? ?/* The alarm IRQ uses absolute time (now+delta), not the relative
> ? ? ? ? * time (delta) in our calling convention. ?Like all clockevents
> ? ? ? ? * using such "match" hardware, we have a race to defend against.
> @@ -169,7 +156,6 @@ clkevt32k_next_event(unsigned long delta, struct clock_event_device *dev)
> ? ? ? ?alm += delta;
> ? ? ? ?at91_sys_write(AT91_ST_RTAR, alm);
>
> - ? ? ? raw_local_irq_restore(flags);
> ? ? ? ?return status;
> ?}
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-at91/at91sam926x_time.c b/arch/arm/mach-at91/at91sam926x_time.c
> index 4bd56ae..c26cd6e 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-at91/at91sam926x_time.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-at91/at91sam926x_time.c
> @@ -62,16 +62,12 @@ static struct clocksource pit_clk = {
> ?static void
> ?pit_clkevt_mode(enum clock_event_mode mode, struct clock_event_device *dev)
> ?{
> - ? ? ? unsigned long ? flags;
> -
> ? ? ? ?switch (mode) {
> ? ? ? ?case CLOCK_EVT_MODE_PERIODIC:
> - ? ? ? ? ? ? ? /* update clocksource counter, then enable the IRQ */
> - ? ? ? ? ? ? ? raw_local_irq_save(flags);
> + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? /* update clocksource counter */
> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?pit_cnt += pit_cycle * PIT_PICNT(at91_sys_read(AT91_PIT_PIVR));
> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?at91_sys_write(AT91_PIT_MR, (pit_cycle - 1) | AT91_PIT_PITEN
> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?| AT91_PIT_PITIEN);
> - ? ? ? ? ? ? ? raw_local_irq_restore(flags);
> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?break;
> ? ? ? ?case CLOCK_EVT_MODE_ONESHOT:
> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?BUG();
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-nomadik/timer.c b/arch/arm/mach-nomadik/timer.c
> index d1738e7..e361be6 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-nomadik/timer.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-nomadik/timer.c
> @@ -54,24 +54,17 @@ static struct clocksource nmdk_clksrc = {
> ?static void nmdk_clkevt_mode(enum clock_event_mode mode,
> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? struct clock_event_device *dev)
> ?{
> - ? ? ? unsigned long flags;
> -
> ? ? ? ?switch (mode) {
> ? ? ? ?case CLOCK_EVT_MODE_PERIODIC:
> - ? ? ? ? ? ? ? /* enable interrupts -- and count current value? */
> - ? ? ? ? ? ? ? raw_local_irq_save(flags);
> + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? /* count current value? */
> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?writel(readl(mtu_base + MTU_IMSC) | 1, mtu_base + MTU_IMSC);
> - ? ? ? ? ? ? ? raw_local_irq_restore(flags);
> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?break;
> ? ? ? ?case CLOCK_EVT_MODE_ONESHOT:
> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?BUG(); /* Not supported, yet */
> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?/* FALLTHROUGH */
> ? ? ? ?case CLOCK_EVT_MODE_SHUTDOWN:
> ? ? ? ?case CLOCK_EVT_MODE_UNUSED:
> - ? ? ? ? ? ? ? /* disable irq */
> - ? ? ? ? ? ? ? raw_local_irq_save(flags);
> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?writel(readl(mtu_base + MTU_IMSC) & ~1, mtu_base + MTU_IMSC);
> - ? ? ? ? ? ? ? raw_local_irq_restore(flags);
> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?break;
> ? ? ? ?case CLOCK_EVT_MODE_RESUME:
> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?break;
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-pxa/time.c b/arch/arm/mach-pxa/time.c
> index 750c448..293e40a 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-pxa/time.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-pxa/time.c
> @@ -76,14 +76,12 @@ pxa_ost0_interrupt(int irq, void *dev_id)
> ?static int
> ?pxa_osmr0_set_next_event(unsigned long delta, struct clock_event_device *dev)
> ?{
> - ? ? ? unsigned long flags, next, oscr;
> + ? ? ? unsigned long next, oscr;
>
> - ? ? ? raw_local_irq_save(flags);
> ? ? ? ?OIER |= OIER_E0;
> ? ? ? ?next = OSCR + delta;
> ? ? ? ?OSMR0 = next;
> ? ? ? ?oscr = OSCR;
> - ? ? ? raw_local_irq_restore(flags);
>
> ? ? ? ?return (signed)(next - oscr) <= MIN_OSCR_DELTA ? -ETIME : 0;
> ?}
> @@ -91,23 +89,17 @@ pxa_osmr0_set_next_event(unsigned long delta, struct clock_event_device *dev)
> ?static void
> ?pxa_osmr0_set_mode(enum clock_event_mode mode, struct clock_event_device *dev)
> ?{
> - ? ? ? unsigned long irqflags;
> -
> ? ? ? ?switch (mode) {
> ? ? ? ?case CLOCK_EVT_MODE_ONESHOT:
> - ? ? ? ? ? ? ? raw_local_irq_save(irqflags);
> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?OIER &= ~OIER_E0;
> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?OSSR = OSSR_M0;
> - ? ? ? ? ? ? ? raw_local_irq_restore(irqflags);
> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?break;
>
> ? ? ? ?case CLOCK_EVT_MODE_UNUSED:
> ? ? ? ?case CLOCK_EVT_MODE_SHUTDOWN:
> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?/* initializing, released, or preparing for suspend */
> - ? ? ? ? ? ? ? raw_local_irq_save(irqflags);
> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?OIER &= ~OIER_E0;
> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?OSSR = OSSR_M0;
> - ? ? ? ? ? ? ? raw_local_irq_restore(irqflags);
> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?break;
>
> ? ? ? ?case CLOCK_EVT_MODE_RESUME:
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-sa1100/time.c b/arch/arm/mach-sa1100/time.c
> index b9cbb56..74b6e0e 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-sa1100/time.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-sa1100/time.c
> @@ -35,14 +35,12 @@ static irqreturn_t sa1100_ost0_interrupt(int irq, void *dev_id)
> ?static int
> ?sa1100_osmr0_set_next_event(unsigned long delta, struct clock_event_device *c)
> ?{
> - ? ? ? unsigned long flags, next, oscr;
> + ? ? ? unsigned long next, oscr;
>
> - ? ? ? raw_local_irq_save(flags);
> ? ? ? ?OIER |= OIER_E0;
> ? ? ? ?next = OSCR + delta;
> ? ? ? ?OSMR0 = next;
> ? ? ? ?oscr = OSCR;
> - ? ? ? raw_local_irq_restore(flags);
>
> ? ? ? ?return (signed)(next - oscr) <= MIN_OSCR_DELTA ? -ETIME : 0;
> ?}
> @@ -50,16 +48,12 @@ sa1100_osmr0_set_next_event(unsigned long delta, struct clock_event_device *c)
> ?static void
> ?sa1100_osmr0_set_mode(enum clock_event_mode mode, struct clock_event_device *c)
> ?{
> - ? ? ? unsigned long flags;
> -
> ? ? ? ?switch (mode) {
> ? ? ? ?case CLOCK_EVT_MODE_ONESHOT:
> ? ? ? ?case CLOCK_EVT_MODE_UNUSED:
> ? ? ? ?case CLOCK_EVT_MODE_SHUTDOWN:
> - ? ? ? ? ? ? ? raw_local_irq_save(flags);
> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?OIER &= ~OIER_E0;
> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?OSSR = OSSR_M0;
> - ? ? ? ? ? ? ? raw_local_irq_restore(flags);
> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?break;
>
> ? ? ? ?case CLOCK_EVT_MODE_RESUME:
> --
> 1.6.5.2
>
>

  parent reply	other threads:[~2009-11-26 10:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 68+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-09-21  7:39 [PATCH] Don't disable irqs in set_next_event and set_mode callbacks Uwe Kleine-König
2009-09-21  9:04 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2009-09-21  9:16   ` Uwe Kleine-König
2009-09-21  9:30     ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2009-09-21 10:48     ` Alessandro Rubini
2009-09-21 12:32 ` Kristoffer Ericson
2009-09-23 19:01   ` Eric Miao
2009-09-23 21:04 ` Remy Bohmer
2009-11-26 10:26 ` [RESENT PATCH] " Uwe Kleine-König
2009-11-26 10:50   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2009-11-26 11:31     ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2009-11-27 10:44       ` Uwe Kleine-König
2009-11-27 19:08         ` Thomas Gleixner
2009-11-27 19:58         ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2009-11-27 20:38           ` Uwe Kleine-König
2009-11-27 20:44             ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2009-11-27 21:31               ` Thomas Gleixner
2009-11-27 21:59                 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2009-11-27 22:20                   ` Thomas Gleixner
2009-11-27 21:10           ` [PATCH] warn about shared irqs requesting IRQF_DISABLED registered with setup_irq Uwe Kleine-König
2009-11-27 22:18             ` Thomas Gleixner
2009-11-28 20:03               ` Uwe Kleine-König
2009-11-28 21:50                 ` Thomas Gleixner
2009-11-28 22:13                   ` David Brownell
2009-11-29  2:31                   ` Jamie Lokier
2009-11-29 10:26                     ` Uwe Kleine-König
2009-11-29 15:18                       ` Jamie Lokier
2009-11-29 15:27                         ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2009-11-30 20:39                           ` Jamie Lokier
2009-11-30  9:28                         ` Uwe Kleine-König
2009-11-30  9:54                         ` Thomas Gleixner
2009-11-28 22:09                 ` David Brownell
2009-11-30 10:47             ` [PATCH] genirq: warn about IRQF_SHARED|IRQF_DISABLED at the right place Uwe Kleine-König
2009-11-30 13:54               ` Get rid of IRQF_DISABLED - (was [PATCH] genirq: warn about IRQF_SHARED|IRQF_DISABLED) Thomas Gleixner
2009-11-30 14:03                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-11-30 14:24                   ` Thomas Gleixner
2009-11-30 14:47                     ` Alan Cox
2009-11-30 15:01                       ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2009-11-30 15:32                         ` Alan Cox
2009-11-30 15:43                           ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2009-11-30 20:15                         ` Andrew Victor
2009-11-30 20:53                         ` David Brownell
2009-11-30 20:38                       ` David Brownell
2009-12-01  1:42                         ` Andy Walls
2009-11-30 19:59                     ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-11-30 21:31                       ` Thomas Gleixner
2009-11-30 21:42                         ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-11-30 21:54                           ` Thomas Gleixner
2009-11-30 14:37                 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2009-11-30 14:39                   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2009-11-30 17:48                     ` Thomas Gleixner
2009-11-30 14:51                   ` Alan Cox
2009-11-30 21:59                     ` Thomas Gleixner
2009-11-30 23:30                       ` Alan Cox
2009-11-30 15:38                   ` Nicolas Pitre
2009-11-30 17:46                   ` Thomas Gleixner
2009-11-30 19:51                 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2009-11-30 21:23                   ` Thomas Gleixner
2009-11-30 20:21               ` [PATCH] genirq: warn about IRQF_SHARED|IRQF_DISABLED at the right place David Brownell
2009-11-30 20:27                 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2010-01-12 15:42               ` [RESEND PATCH] " Uwe Kleine-König
2009-11-26 10:51   ` Eric Miao [this message]
2009-12-17 13:33   ` [PATCH 1/2] arm/at91: Don't disable irqs in set_next_event and set_mode callbacks Uwe Kleine-König
2009-12-17 13:33     ` [PATCH 2/2] arm/{pxa, sa1100, nomadik}: Don't disable irqs in set_next_event and set_mode Uwe Kleine-König
2010-01-22 16:08     ` [PATCH 1/2] arm/at91: Don't disable irqs in set_next_event and set_mode callbacks Uwe Kleine-König
2010-01-22 16:36       ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-01-22 16:52         ` Uwe Kleine-König
2010-02-12 10:35           ` Uwe Kleine-König

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=f17812d70911260251r2089c810ude2339a3cf12ee94@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=eric.y.miao@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).