From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: eric.y.miao@gmail.com (Eric Miao) Date: Tue, 29 Dec 2009 09:07:57 +0800 Subject: [PATCH 4/7] [ARM] locomo: allow cascaded IRQ base to be specified by platforms In-Reply-To: <20091228211455.GA1612@ucw.cz> References: <1261977488-18271-1-git-send-email-eric.y.miao@gmail.com> <1261977488-18271-5-git-send-email-eric.y.miao@gmail.com> <20091228211455.GA1612@ucw.cz> Message-ID: To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 5:14 AM, Pavel Machek wrote: > On Mon 2009-12-28 13:18:05, Eric Miao wrote: >> Signed-off-by: Eric Miao >> --- >> ?arch/arm/common/locomo.c ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? | ? 49 +++++++++++++++++------------- >> ?arch/arm/include/asm/hardware/locomo.h ? | ? ?4 ++ >> ?arch/arm/mach-pxa/include/mach/irqs.h ? ?| ? ?6 ---- >> ?arch/arm/mach-pxa/poodle.c ? ? ? ? ? ? ? | ? ?7 ++++ >> ?arch/arm/mach-sa1100/collie.c ? ? ? ? ? ?| ? ?4 ++ >> ?arch/arm/mach-sa1100/include/mach/irqs.h | ? 11 +----- >> ?6 files changed, 45 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-) > > How was this tested? Maybe ccing thomas would be good idea? > (.... Trying to think why Yinghai is Cc'ed here?) Yeah, I almost forgot. Now Thomas CC'ed. I've roughly tested this on SL-5600 (poodle), which seems to be all right. Yet, collie seems to declare several sub-devices which are never used. Thomas' test on this will be really appreciated.